1
1
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2024-12-28 11:34:26 +00:00
gitea/tests/integration/oauth_test.go

910 lines
33 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
// Copyright 2019 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
package integration
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
import (
"bytes"
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 04:06:41 +00:00
"encoding/base64"
"fmt"
"io"
"net/http"
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 04:06:41 +00:00
"strings"
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
"testing"
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 04:06:41 +00:00
auth_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/auth"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/json"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 04:06:41 +00:00
api "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/structs"
oauth2_provider "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/oauth2_provider"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/tests"
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 04:06:41 +00:00
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
)
func TestAuthorizeNoClientID(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/authorize")
ctx := loginUser(t, "user2")
resp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
assert.Contains(t, resp.Body.String(), "Client ID not registered")
}
func TestAuthorizeUnregisteredRedirect(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138&redirect_uri=UNREGISTERED&response_type=code&state=thestate")
ctx := loginUser(t, "user1")
resp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
assert.Contains(t, resp.Body.String(), "Unregistered Redirect URI")
}
func TestAuthorizeUnsupportedResponseType(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138&redirect_uri=a&response_type=UNEXPECTED&state=thestate")
ctx := loginUser(t, "user1")
resp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusSeeOther)
u, err := resp.Result().Location()
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, "unsupported_response_type", u.Query().Get("error"))
assert.Equal(t, "Only code response type is supported.", u.Query().Get("error_description"))
}
func TestAuthorizeUnsupportedCodeChallengeMethod(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138&redirect_uri=a&response_type=code&state=thestate&code_challenge_method=UNEXPECTED")
ctx := loginUser(t, "user1")
resp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusSeeOther)
u, err := resp.Result().Location()
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, "invalid_request", u.Query().Get("error"))
assert.Equal(t, "unsupported code challenge method", u.Query().Get("error_description"))
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
}
func TestAuthorizeLoginRedirect(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/authorize")
assert.Contains(t, MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusSeeOther).Body.String(), "/user/login")
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
}
func TestAuthorizeShow(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138&redirect_uri=a&response_type=code&state=thestate")
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
ctx := loginUser(t, "user4")
resp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
htmlDoc := NewHTMLParser(t, resp.Body)
htmlDoc.AssertElement(t, "#authorize-app", true)
htmlDoc.GetCSRF()
}
func TestAuthorizeRedirectWithExistingGrant(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fexample.com%2Fxyzzy&response_type=code&state=thestate")
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
ctx := loginUser(t, "user1")
resp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusSeeOther)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
u, err := resp.Result().Location()
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, "thestate", u.Query().Get("state"))
assert.Truef(t, len(u.Query().Get("code")) > 30, "authorization code '%s' should be longer then 30", u.Query().Get("code"))
u.RawQuery = ""
assert.Equal(t, "https://example.com/xyzzy", u.String())
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
}
Record OAuth client type at registration (#21316) The OAuth spec [defines two types of client](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-2.1), confidential and public. Previously Gitea assumed all clients to be confidential. > OAuth defines two client types, based on their ability to authenticate securely with the authorization server (i.e., ability to > maintain the confidentiality of their client credentials): > > confidential > Clients capable of maintaining the confidentiality of their credentials (e.g., client implemented on a secure server with > restricted access to the client credentials), or capable of secure client authentication using other means. > > **public > Clients incapable of maintaining the confidentiality of their credentials (e.g., clients executing on the device used by the resource owner, such as an installed native application or a web browser-based application), and incapable of secure client authentication via any other means.** > > The client type designation is based on the authorization server's definition of secure authentication and its acceptable exposure levels of client credentials. The authorization server SHOULD NOT make assumptions about the client type. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.4 > Authorization servers MUST record the client type in the client registration details in order to identify and process requests accordingly. Require PKCE for public clients: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8252#section-8.1 > Authorization servers SHOULD reject authorization requests from native apps that don't use PKCE by returning an error message Fixes #21299 Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2022-10-24 07:59:24 +00:00
func TestAuthorizePKCERequiredForPublicClient(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=ce5a1322-42a7-11ed-b878-0242ac120002&redirect_uri=http%3A%2F%2F127.0.0.1&response_type=code&state=thestate")
ctx := loginUser(t, "user1")
resp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusSeeOther)
u, err := resp.Result().Location()
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.Equal(t, "invalid_request", u.Query().Get("error"))
assert.Equal(t, "PKCE is required for public clients", u.Query().Get("error_description"))
}
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
func TestAccessTokenExchange(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
})
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
}
parsed := new(response)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
assert.True(t, len(parsed.AccessToken) > 10)
assert.True(t, len(parsed.RefreshToken) > 10)
}
func TestAccessTokenExchangeWithPublicClient(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "ce5a1322-42a7-11ed-b878-0242ac120002",
"redirect_uri": "http://127.0.0.1",
"code": "authcodepublic",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
})
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
}
parsed := new(response)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
assert.True(t, len(parsed.AccessToken) > 10)
assert.True(t, len(parsed.RefreshToken) > 10)
}
func TestAccessTokenExchangeJSON(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
2019-04-15 15:54:50 +00:00
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
2019-04-15 15:54:50 +00:00
})
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
2019-04-15 15:54:50 +00:00
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
}
parsed := new(response)
2019-04-15 15:54:50 +00:00
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
assert.True(t, len(parsed.AccessToken) > 10)
assert.True(t, len(parsed.RefreshToken) > 10)
}
func TestAccessTokenExchangeWithoutPKCE(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
})
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError := new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "unauthorized_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "failed PKCE code challenge", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
}
func TestAccessTokenExchangeWithInvalidCredentials(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
// invalid client id
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "???",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
})
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError := new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "invalid_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "cannot load client with client id: '???'", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
// invalid client secret
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "???",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
})
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "unauthorized_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "invalid client secret", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
// invalid redirect uri
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "???",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
})
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "unauthorized_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "unexpected redirect URI", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
// invalid authorization code
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "???",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
})
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "unauthorized_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "client is not authorized", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
// invalid grant_type
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "???",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
})
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "unsupported_grant_type", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "Only refresh_token or authorization_code grant type is supported", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
2019-03-08 16:42:50 +00:00
}
func TestAccessTokenExchangeWithBasicAuth(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
})
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Basic ZGE3ZGEzYmEtOWExMy00MTY3LTg1NmYtMzg5OWRlMGIwMTM4OjRNSzhOYTZSNTVzbWRDWTBXdUNDdW1aNmhqUlBuR1k1c2FXVlJISGpKaUE9")
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
}
parsed := new(response)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
assert.True(t, len(parsed.AccessToken) > 10)
assert.True(t, len(parsed.RefreshToken) > 10)
// use wrong client_secret
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
})
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Basic ZGE3ZGEzYmEtOWExMy00MTY3LTg1NmYtMzg5OWRlMGIwMTM4OmJsYWJsYQ==")
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError := new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "unauthorized_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "invalid client secret", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
// missing header
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
})
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "invalid_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "cannot load client with client id: ''", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
// client_id inconsistent with Authorization header
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"client_id": "inconsistent",
})
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Basic ZGE3ZGEzYmEtOWExMy00MTY3LTg1NmYtMzg5OWRlMGIwMTM4OjRNSzhOYTZSNTVzbWRDWTBXdUNDdW1aNmhqUlBuR1k1c2FXVlJISGpKaUE9")
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "invalid_request", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "client_id in request body inconsistent with Authorization header", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
// client_secret inconsistent with Authorization header
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"client_secret": "inconsistent",
})
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Basic ZGE3ZGEzYmEtOWExMy00MTY3LTg1NmYtMzg5OWRlMGIwMTM4OjRNSzhOYTZSNTVzbWRDWTBXdUNDdW1aNmhqUlBuR1k1c2FXVlJISGpKaUE9")
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "invalid_request", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "client_secret in request body inconsistent with Authorization header", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
}
func TestRefreshTokenInvalidation(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
})
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
}
parsed := new(response)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
// test without invalidation
setting.OAuth2.InvalidateRefreshTokens = false
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "refresh_token",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
// omit secret
"redirect_uri": "a",
"refresh_token": parsed.RefreshToken,
})
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError := new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "invalid_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "invalid empty client secret", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "refresh_token",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"refresh_token": "UNEXPECTED",
})
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "unauthorized_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "unable to parse refresh token", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "refresh_token",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"refresh_token": parsed.RefreshToken,
})
bs, err := io.ReadAll(req.Body)
assert.NoError(t, err)
req.Body = io.NopCloser(bytes.NewReader(bs))
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
req.Body = io.NopCloser(bytes.NewReader(bs))
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
// test with invalidation
setting.OAuth2.InvalidateRefreshTokens = true
req.Body = io.NopCloser(bytes.NewReader(bs))
MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
// repeat request should fail
req.Body = io.NopCloser(bytes.NewReader(bs))
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusBadRequest)
parsedError = new(oauth2_provider.AccessTokenError)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsedError))
assert.Equal(t, "unauthorized_client", string(parsedError.ErrorCode))
assert.Equal(t, "token was already used", parsedError.ErrorDescription)
}
func TestOAuthIntrospection(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
req := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": "da7da3ba-9a13-4167-856f-3899de0b0138",
"client_secret": "4MK8Na6R55smdCY0WuCCumZ6hjRPnGY5saWVRHHjJiA=",
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": "authcode",
"code_verifier": "N1Zo9-8Rfwhkt68r1r29ty8YwIraXR8eh_1Qwxg7yQXsonBt",
})
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
}
parsed := new(response)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
assert.True(t, len(parsed.AccessToken) > 10)
assert.True(t, len(parsed.RefreshToken) > 10)
// successful request with a valid client_id/client_secret and a valid token
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/introspect", map[string]string{
"token": parsed.AccessToken,
})
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Basic ZGE3ZGEzYmEtOWExMy00MTY3LTg1NmYtMzg5OWRlMGIwMTM4OjRNSzhOYTZSNTVzbWRDWTBXdUNDdW1aNmhqUlBuR1k1c2FXVlJISGpKaUE9")
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
type introspectResponse struct {
Active bool `json:"active"`
Scope string `json:"scope,omitempty"`
Username string `json:"username"`
}
introspectParsed := new(introspectResponse)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), introspectParsed))
assert.True(t, introspectParsed.Active)
assert.Equal(t, "user1", introspectParsed.Username)
// successful request with a valid client_id/client_secret, but an invalid token
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/introspect", map[string]string{
"token": "xyzzy",
})
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Basic ZGE3ZGEzYmEtOWExMy00MTY3LTg1NmYtMzg5OWRlMGIwMTM4OjRNSzhOYTZSNTVzbWRDWTBXdUNDdW1aNmhqUlBuR1k1c2FXVlJISGpKaUE9")
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusOK)
introspectParsed = new(introspectResponse)
assert.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(resp.Body.Bytes(), introspectParsed))
assert.False(t, introspectParsed.Active)
// unsuccessful request with an invalid client_id/client_secret
req = NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/introspect", map[string]string{
"token": parsed.AccessToken,
})
req.Header.Add("Authorization", "Basic ZGE3ZGEzYmEtOWExMy00MTY3LTg1NmYtMzg5OWRlMGIwMTM4OjRNSzhOYTZSNTVzbWRDWTBXdUNDdW1aNmhqUlBuR1k1c2FXVlJISGpK")
resp = MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusUnauthorized)
assert.Contains(t, resp.Body.String(), "no valid authorization")
}
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 04:06:41 +00:00
func TestOAuth_GrantScopesReadUserFailRepos(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
appBody := api.CreateOAuth2ApplicationOptions{
Name: "oauth-provider-scopes-test",
RedirectURIs: []string{
"a",
},
ConfidentialClient: true,
}
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/user/applications/oauth2", &appBody).
AddBasicAuth(user.Name)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
var app *api.OAuth2Application
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &app)
grant := &auth_model.OAuth2Grant{
ApplicationID: app.ID,
UserID: user.ID,
Scope: "openid read:user",
}
err := db.Insert(db.DefaultContext, grant)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Contains(t, grant.Scope, "openid read:user")
ctx := loginUser(t, user.Name)
authorizeURL := fmt.Sprintf("/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=%s&redirect_uri=a&response_type=code&state=thestate", app.ClientID)
authorizeReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", authorizeURL)
authorizeResp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, authorizeReq, http.StatusSeeOther)
authcode := strings.Split(strings.Split(authorizeResp.Body.String(), "?code=")[1], "&amp")[0]
accessTokenReq := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": app.ClientID,
"client_secret": app.ClientSecret,
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": authcode,
})
accessTokenResp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, accessTokenReq, 200)
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
}
parsed := new(response)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(accessTokenResp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
userReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/user")
userReq.SetHeader("Authorization", "Bearer "+parsed.AccessToken)
userResp := MakeRequest(t, userReq, http.StatusOK)
type userResponse struct {
Login string `json:"login"`
Email string `json:"email"`
}
userParsed := new(userResponse)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(userResp.Body.Bytes(), userParsed))
assert.Contains(t, userParsed.Email, "user2@example.com")
errorReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/users/user2/repos")
errorReq.SetHeader("Authorization", "Bearer "+parsed.AccessToken)
errorResp := MakeRequest(t, errorReq, http.StatusForbidden)
type errorResponse struct {
Message string `json:"message"`
}
errorParsed := new(errorResponse)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(errorResp.Body.Bytes(), errorParsed))
assert.Contains(t, errorParsed.Message, "token does not have at least one of required scope(s), required=[read:repository]")
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 04:06:41 +00:00
}
func TestOAuth_GrantScopesReadRepositoryFailOrganization(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
appBody := api.CreateOAuth2ApplicationOptions{
Name: "oauth-provider-scopes-test",
RedirectURIs: []string{
"a",
},
ConfidentialClient: true,
}
req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/user/applications/oauth2", &appBody).
AddBasicAuth(user.Name)
resp := MakeRequest(t, req, http.StatusCreated)
var app *api.OAuth2Application
DecodeJSON(t, resp, &app)
grant := &auth_model.OAuth2Grant{
ApplicationID: app.ID,
UserID: user.ID,
Scope: "openid read:user read:repository",
}
err := db.Insert(db.DefaultContext, grant)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.Contains(t, grant.Scope, "openid read:user read:repository")
ctx := loginUser(t, user.Name)
authorizeURL := fmt.Sprintf("/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=%s&redirect_uri=a&response_type=code&state=thestate", app.ClientID)
authorizeReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", authorizeURL)
authorizeResp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, authorizeReq, http.StatusSeeOther)
authcode := strings.Split(strings.Split(authorizeResp.Body.String(), "?code=")[1], "&amp")[0]
accessTokenReq := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": app.ClientID,
"client_secret": app.ClientSecret,
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": authcode,
})
accessTokenResp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, accessTokenReq, http.StatusOK)
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
}
parsed := new(response)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(accessTokenResp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
userReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/users/user2/repos")
userReq.SetHeader("Authorization", "Bearer "+parsed.AccessToken)
userResp := MakeRequest(t, userReq, http.StatusOK)
type repo struct {
FullRepoName string `json:"full_name"`
Private bool `json:"private"`
}
var reposCaptured []repo
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(userResp.Body.Bytes(), &reposCaptured))
reposExpected := []repo{
{
FullRepoName: "user2/repo1",
Private: false,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/repo2",
Private: true,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/repo15",
Private: true,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/repo16",
Private: true,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/repo20",
Private: true,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/utf8",
Private: false,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/commits_search_test",
Private: false,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/git_hooks_test",
Private: false,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/glob",
Private: false,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/lfs",
Private: true,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/scoped_label",
Private: true,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/readme-test",
Private: true,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/repo-release",
Private: false,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/commitsonpr",
Private: false,
},
{
FullRepoName: "user2/test_commit_revert",
Private: true,
},
}
assert.Equal(t, reposExpected, reposCaptured)
errorReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/api/v1/users/user2/orgs")
errorReq.SetHeader("Authorization", "Bearer "+parsed.AccessToken)
errorResp := MakeRequest(t, errorReq, http.StatusForbidden)
type errorResponse struct {
Message string `json:"message"`
}
errorParsed := new(errorResponse)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(errorResp.Body.Bytes(), errorParsed))
assert.Contains(t, errorParsed.Message, "token does not have at least one of required scope(s), required=[read:user read:organization]")
Enhancing Gitea OAuth2 Provider with Granular Scopes for Resource Access (#32573) Resolve #31609 This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management features, such as a change password UI. Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2 application. This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only** the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and `groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already introduced with [personal tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g. `read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...) Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info, repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications, miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read and/or write permissions. The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2 Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add `openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users resources. Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues, it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and `read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues. My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized, supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims) on auth0.com. I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID` so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above. Screenshots: ![Screenshot_20241121_121405](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/29deaed7-4333-4b02-8898-b822e6f2463e) ![Screenshot_20241121_120211](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7a4a4ef7-409c-4116-9d5f-2fe00eb37167) ![Screenshot_20241121_120119](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa52c1a2-212d-4e64-bcdf-7122cee49eb6) ![Screenshot_20241121_120018](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9eac318c-e381-4ea9-9e2c-3a3f60319e47) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2024-11-22 04:06:41 +00:00
}
func TestOAuth_GrantScopesClaimPublicOnlyGroups(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{Name: "user2"})
appBody := api.CreateOAuth2ApplicationOptions{
Name: "oauth-provider-scopes-test",
RedirectURIs: []string{
"a",
},
ConfidentialClient: true,
}
appReq := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/user/applications/oauth2", &appBody).
AddBasicAuth(user.Name)
appResp := MakeRequest(t, appReq, http.StatusCreated)
var app *api.OAuth2Application
DecodeJSON(t, appResp, &app)
grant := &auth_model.OAuth2Grant{
ApplicationID: app.ID,
UserID: user.ID,
Scope: "openid groups read:user public-only",
}
err := db.Insert(db.DefaultContext, grant)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{"openid", "groups", "read:user", "public-only"}, strings.Split(grant.Scope, " "))
ctx := loginUser(t, user.Name)
authorizeURL := fmt.Sprintf("/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=%s&redirect_uri=a&response_type=code&state=thestate", app.ClientID)
authorizeReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", authorizeURL)
authorizeResp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, authorizeReq, http.StatusSeeOther)
authcode := strings.Split(strings.Split(authorizeResp.Body.String(), "?code=")[1], "&amp")[0]
accessTokenReq := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": app.ClientID,
"client_secret": app.ClientSecret,
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": authcode,
})
accessTokenResp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, accessTokenReq, http.StatusOK)
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
IDToken string `json:"id_token,omitempty"`
}
parsed := new(response)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(accessTokenResp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
parts := strings.Split(parsed.IDToken, ".")
payload, _ := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(parts[1])
type IDTokenClaims struct {
Groups []string `json:"groups"`
}
claims := new(IDTokenClaims)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(payload, claims))
userinfoReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/userinfo")
userinfoReq.SetHeader("Authorization", "Bearer "+parsed.AccessToken)
userinfoResp := MakeRequest(t, userinfoReq, http.StatusOK)
type userinfoResponse struct {
Login string `json:"login"`
Email string `json:"email"`
Groups []string `json:"groups"`
}
userinfoParsed := new(userinfoResponse)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(userinfoResp.Body.Bytes(), userinfoParsed))
assert.Contains(t, userinfoParsed.Email, "user2@example.com")
// test both id_token and call to /login/oauth/userinfo
for _, publicGroup := range []string{
"org17",
"org17:test_team",
"org3",
"org3:owners",
"org3:team1",
"org3:teamcreaterepo",
} {
assert.Contains(t, claims.Groups, publicGroup)
assert.Contains(t, userinfoParsed.Groups, publicGroup)
}
for _, privateGroup := range []string{
"private_org35",
"private_org35_team24",
} {
assert.NotContains(t, claims.Groups, privateGroup)
assert.NotContains(t, userinfoParsed.Groups, privateGroup)
}
}
func TestOAuth_GrantScopesClaimAllGroups(t *testing.T) {
defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)()
user := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{Name: "user2"})
appBody := api.CreateOAuth2ApplicationOptions{
Name: "oauth-provider-scopes-test",
RedirectURIs: []string{
"a",
},
ConfidentialClient: true,
}
appReq := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/user/applications/oauth2", &appBody).
AddBasicAuth(user.Name)
appResp := MakeRequest(t, appReq, http.StatusCreated)
var app *api.OAuth2Application
DecodeJSON(t, appResp, &app)
grant := &auth_model.OAuth2Grant{
ApplicationID: app.ID,
UserID: user.ID,
Scope: "openid groups",
}
err := db.Insert(db.DefaultContext, grant)
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.ElementsMatch(t, []string{"openid", "groups"}, strings.Split(grant.Scope, " "))
ctx := loginUser(t, user.Name)
authorizeURL := fmt.Sprintf("/login/oauth/authorize?client_id=%s&redirect_uri=a&response_type=code&state=thestate", app.ClientID)
authorizeReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", authorizeURL)
authorizeResp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, authorizeReq, http.StatusSeeOther)
authcode := strings.Split(strings.Split(authorizeResp.Body.String(), "?code=")[1], "&amp")[0]
accessTokenReq := NewRequestWithValues(t, "POST", "/login/oauth/access_token", map[string]string{
"grant_type": "authorization_code",
"client_id": app.ClientID,
"client_secret": app.ClientSecret,
"redirect_uri": "a",
"code": authcode,
})
accessTokenResp := ctx.MakeRequest(t, accessTokenReq, http.StatusOK)
type response struct {
AccessToken string `json:"access_token"`
TokenType string `json:"token_type"`
ExpiresIn int64 `json:"expires_in"`
RefreshToken string `json:"refresh_token"`
IDToken string `json:"id_token,omitempty"`
}
parsed := new(response)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(accessTokenResp.Body.Bytes(), parsed))
parts := strings.Split(parsed.IDToken, ".")
payload, _ := base64.RawURLEncoding.DecodeString(parts[1])
type IDTokenClaims struct {
Groups []string `json:"groups"`
}
claims := new(IDTokenClaims)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(payload, claims))
userinfoReq := NewRequest(t, "GET", "/login/oauth/userinfo")
userinfoReq.SetHeader("Authorization", "Bearer "+parsed.AccessToken)
userinfoResp := MakeRequest(t, userinfoReq, http.StatusOK)
type userinfoResponse struct {
Login string `json:"login"`
Email string `json:"email"`
Groups []string `json:"groups"`
}
userinfoParsed := new(userinfoResponse)
require.NoError(t, json.Unmarshal(userinfoResp.Body.Bytes(), userinfoParsed))
assert.Contains(t, userinfoParsed.Email, "user2@example.com")
// test both id_token and call to /login/oauth/userinfo
for _, group := range []string{
"org17",
"org17:test_team",
"org3",
"org3:owners",
"org3:team1",
"org3:teamcreaterepo",
"private_org35",
"private_org35:team24",
} {
assert.Contains(t, claims.Groups, group)
assert.Contains(t, userinfoParsed.Groups, group)
}
}