gitea/tests/gitea-repositories-meta/org42/search-by-path.git/description

This repository will be used to test code search. The snippet below shows its directory structure

.
├── avocado.md
├── cucumber.md
├── ham.md
├── potato
|   └── ham.md
└── example-file.js
Allow code search by filename (#32210) This is a large and complex PR, so let me explain in detail its changes. First, I had to create new index mappings for Bleve and ElasticSerach as the current ones do not support search by filename. This requires Gitea to recreate the code search indexes (I do not know if this is a breaking change, but I feel it deserves a heads-up). I've used [this approach](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/7.17/analysis-pathhierarchy-tokenizer.html) to model the filename index. It allows us to efficiently search for both the full path and the name of a file. Bleve, however, does not support this out-of-box, so I had to code a brand new [token filter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Token-Filters/) to generate the search terms. I also did an overhaul in the `indexer_test.go` file. It now asserts the order of the expected results (this is important since matches based on the name of a file are more relevant than those based on its content). I've added new test scenarios that deal with searching by filename. They use a new repo included in the Gitea fixture. The screenshot below depicts how Gitea shows the search results. It shows results based on content in the same way as the current version does. In matches based on the filename, the first seven lines of the file contents are shown (BTW, this is how GitHub does it). ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d938d86-1a8d-4f89-8644-1921a473e858) Resolves #32096 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com> 2024-10-11 23:35:04 +00:00			`This repository will be used to test code search. The snippet below shows its directory structure`

			`.`
			`├── avocado.md`
			`├── cucumber.md`
			`├── ham.md`
Updated tokenizer to better matching when search for code snippets (#32261) This PR improves the accuracy of Gitea's code search. Currently, Gitea does not consider statements such as `onsole.log("hello")` as hits when the user searches for `log`. The culprit is how both ES and Bleve are tokenizing the file contents (in both cases, `console.log` is a whole token). In ES' case, we changed the tokenizer to [simple_pattern_split](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/analysis-simplepatternsplit-tokenizer.html#:~:text=The%20simple_pattern_split%20tokenizer%20uses%20a,the%20tokenization%20is%20generally%20faster.). In such a case, tokens are words formed by digits and letters. In Bleve's case, it employs a [letter](https://blevesearch.com/docs/Tokenizers/) tokenizer. Resolves #32220 --------- Signed-off-by: Bruno Sofiato <bruno.sofiato@gmail.com> 2024-11-06 20:51:20 +00:00			`├── potato`
			`\| └── ham.md`
			`└── example-file.js`