tdsds.com/gitea
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2025-07-22 18:28:37 +00:00
Code Releases Activity

Delete issue_service.CreateComment (#26298)

Browse Source 
I noticed that `issue_service.CreateComment` adds transaction operations
on `issues_model.CreateComment`, we can merge the two functions and we
can avoid calling each other's methods in the `services` layer.

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This commit is contained in:
caicandong
2023-08-04 21:34:34 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 2de0752be7
commit 6151e69d95
5 changed files with 17 additions and 31 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
services/pull/review.go
View File

@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ import (
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/notification"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
issue_service "code.gitea.io/gitea/services/issue"
)
var notEnoughLines = regexp.MustCompile(`fatal: file .* has only \d+ lines?`)
@@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ func createCodeComment(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, repo *repo_mo
return nil, err
}
}
return issue_service.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
return issues_model.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeCode,
Doer: doer,
Repo: repo,
@@ -340,7 +339,7 @@ func DismissApprovalReviews(ctx context.Context, doer *user_model.User, pull *is
return err
}
comment, err := issue_service.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
comment, err := issues_model.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
Doer: doer,
Content: "New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings",
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeDismissReview,
@@ -411,7 +410,7 @@ func DismissReview(ctx context.Context, reviewID, repoID int64, message string,
return nil, err
}
comment, err = issue_service.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
comment, err = issues_model.CreateComment(ctx, &issues_model.CreateCommentOptions{
Doer: doer,
Content: message,
Type: issues_model.CommentTypeDismissReview,