mirror of
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
synced 2025-07-25 11:48:37 +00:00
Fix git commit committer parsing and add some tests (#35007)
* Fix #34991 * Fix #34882 --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1166,12 +1166,6 @@ func ValidateCommitsWithEmails(ctx context.Context, oldCommits []*git.Commit) ([
|
||||
|
||||
for _, c := range oldCommits {
|
||||
user := emailUserMap.GetByEmail(c.Author.Email) // FIXME: why ValidateCommitsWithEmails uses "Author", but ParseCommitsWithSignature uses "Committer"?
|
||||
if user == nil {
|
||||
user = &User{
|
||||
Name: c.Author.Name,
|
||||
Email: c.Author.Email,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
newCommits = append(newCommits, &UserCommit{
|
||||
User: user,
|
||||
Commit: c,
|
||||
@@ -1195,12 +1189,14 @@ func GetUsersByEmails(ctx context.Context, emails []string) (*EmailUserMap, erro
|
||||
|
||||
needCheckEmails := make(container.Set[string])
|
||||
needCheckUserNames := make(container.Set[string])
|
||||
noReplyAddressSuffix := "@" + strings.ToLower(setting.Service.NoReplyAddress)
|
||||
for _, email := range emails {
|
||||
if strings.HasSuffix(email, "@"+setting.Service.NoReplyAddress) {
|
||||
username := strings.TrimSuffix(email, "@"+setting.Service.NoReplyAddress)
|
||||
needCheckUserNames.Add(strings.ToLower(username))
|
||||
emailLower := strings.ToLower(email)
|
||||
if noReplyUserNameLower, ok := strings.CutSuffix(emailLower, noReplyAddressSuffix); ok {
|
||||
needCheckUserNames.Add(noReplyUserNameLower)
|
||||
needCheckEmails.Add(emailLower)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
needCheckEmails.Add(strings.ToLower(email))
|
||||
needCheckEmails.Add(emailLower)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@@ -85,6 +85,11 @@ func TestUserEmails(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
testGetUserByEmail(t, c.Email, c.UID)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("NoReplyConflict", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
setting.Service.NoReplyAddress = "example.com"
|
||||
testGetUserByEmail(t, "user1-2@example.COM", 1)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user