tdsds.com/gitea
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2025-07-19 16:58:37 +00:00
Code Releases Activity

Use batch database operations instead of one by one to optimze api pulls (#32680)

Browse Source 
Resolve #31492

The response time for the Pull Requests API has improved significantly,
dropping from over `2000ms` to about `350ms` on my local machine. It's
about `6` times faster.

A key area for further optimization lies in batch-fetching data for
`apiPullRequest.ChangedFiles, apiPullRequest.Additions, and
apiPullRequest.Deletions`.

Tests `TestAPIViewPulls` does exist and new tests added.

- This PR also fixes some bugs in `GetDiff` functions.
- This PR also fixes data inconsistent in test data. For a pull request,
the head branch's reference should be equal to the reference in
`pull/xxx/head`.
This commit is contained in:
Lunny Xiao
2024-12-10 13:15:06 -08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 2ac6f2b129
commit fbe6d9dc6b
15 changed files with 566 additions and 93 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
models/issues/review_test.go
View File

@@ -126,42 +126,48 @@ func TestGetReviewersByIssueID(t *testing.T) {
user2 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 2})
org3 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 3})
user4 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 4})
user5 := unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &user_model.User{ID: 5})
expectedReviews := []*issues_model.Review{}
expectedReviews = append(expectedReviews,
&issues_model.Review{
ID: 7,
Reviewer: org3,
Type: issues_model.ReviewTypeReject,
UpdatedUnix: 946684812,
},
&issues_model.Review{
ID: 8,
Reviewer: user4,
Type: issues_model.ReviewTypeApprove,
UpdatedUnix: 946684813,
},
&issues_model.Review{
ID: 9,
Reviewer: user2,
Type: issues_model.ReviewTypeReject,
UpdatedUnix: 946684814,
})
},
&issues_model.Review{
ID: 10,
Reviewer: user_model.NewGhostUser(),
Type: issues_model.ReviewTypeReject,
UpdatedUnix: 946684815,
},
&issues_model.Review{
ID: 22,
Reviewer: user5,
Type: issues_model.ReviewTypeRequest,
UpdatedUnix: 946684817,
},
)
allReviews, err := issues_model.GetReviewsByIssueID(db.DefaultContext, issue.ID)
assert.NoError(t, err)
for _, review := range allReviews {
assert.NoError(t, review.LoadReviewer(db.DefaultContext))
}
if assert.Len(t, allReviews, 3) {
for i, review := range allReviews {
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].Reviewer, review.Reviewer)
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].Type, review.Type)
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].UpdatedUnix, review.UpdatedUnix)
}
}
allReviews, err = issues_model.GetReviewsByIssueID(db.DefaultContext, issue.ID)
assert.NoError(t, err)
assert.NoError(t, allReviews.LoadReviewers(db.DefaultContext))
if assert.Len(t, allReviews, 3) {
if assert.Len(t, allReviews, 5) {
for i, review := range allReviews {
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].Reviewer, review.Reviewer)
assert.Equal(t, expectedReviews[i].Type, review.Type)