Backport #31028 by @kemzeb
From
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/31018#issuecomment-2119622680.
This commit removes the link to a deleted branch name because it returns
a 404 while it is in this deleted state. GitHub also throws a 404 when
navigating to a branch link that was just deleted, but this deleted
branch is removed from the branch list after a page refresh. Since with
Gitea this deleted branch would be kept around for quite some time
(well, until the "cleanup deleted branches" cron job begins), it makes
sense to not have this as a link that users can navigate to.
Co-authored-by: Kemal Zebari <60799661+kemzeb@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #31003 by wxiaoguang
Fix#31002
1. Mention Make sure `Host` and `X-Fowarded-Proto` headers are correctly passed to Gitea
2. Clarify the basic requirements and move the "general configuration" to the top
3. Add a comment for the "container registry"
4. Use 1.21 behavior if the reverse proxy is not correctly configured
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Just a small commit to fix a wrong label for id.
Thanks and cheers!
Signed-off-by: Frank Villaro-Dixon <frank@villaro-dixon.eu>
Co-authored-by: Frank Villaro-Dixon <frank@vi-di.fr>
Backport #30977 by @lunny
The double quotes and the prefix/suffix space are unnecessary.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #30962 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes#30959
Adds an API test for protected tags.
Fix existing tag in combination with fixtures.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #30894 by @lunny
Fix#30872
We will assume the database is consistent before executing the
migration. So the indexes should exist. Removing `IF EXIST` then is safe
enough.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #27821 by @lunny
When a user logout and then login another user, the reverseproxy auth
should be checked before session otherwise the old user is still login.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #30930 by @wolfogre
It's time (maybe somewhat late) to remove some deprecated stuff for the
runner.
- `x-runner-version`: runners needn't to report version in every
request, they will call `Declare`.
- `AgentLabels`: runners will report them as `Labels`.
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Backport #30696 by @lunny
# The problem
The previous implementation will start multiple POST requests from the
frontend when moving a column and another bug is moving the default
column will never be remembered in fact.
# What's changed
- [x] This PR will allow the default column to move to a non-first
position
- [x] And it also uses one request instead of multiple requests when
moving the columns
- [x] Use a star instead of a pin as the icon for setting the default
column action
- [x] Inserted new column will be append to the end
- [x] Fix#30701 the newly added issue will be append to the end of the
default column
- [x] Fix when deleting a column, all issues in it will be displayed
from UI but database records exist.
- [x] Add a limitation for columns in a project to 20. So the sorting
will not be overflow because it's int8.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #30805 by @lunny
Merging PR may fail because of various problems. The pull request may
have a dirty state because there is no transaction when merging a pull
request. ref
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/25741#issuecomment-2074126393
This PR moves all database update operations to post-receive handler for
merging a pull request and having a database transaction. That means if
database operations fail, then the git merging will fail, the git client
will get a fail result.
There are already many tests for pull request merging, so we don't need
to add a new one.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #30874 by @lunny
The actions artifacts should be able to be migrate to the new storage
place.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #30858 by wxiaoguang
1. "enter" doesn't work (I think it is the last enter support for #14843)
2. if a branch name contains something like `&`, then the branch selector doesn't update
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #29674 by @yp05327
Fix#29514
there are too many usage of `NewRequestWithValues`, so there's no need
to check all of them.
Just one is enough I think.
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
