Fixes#19091
Add Feed for Releases and Tags, can be accessed through
`reponame/releases.rss`, `reponame/releases.atom`, `reponame/tags.rss`,
and `reponame/tags.atom`
Signed-off-by: Reo <reo_999@proton.me>
updating libcurl fixes the mismatch between curl and libcurl
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
As described in the linked issue (#22091), semi-transparent UI elements
would result in JS errors due to the fact that the CSS `backgroundColor`
element was being matched by the pattern
`^rgb\((\d+),\s*(\d+),\s*(\d+)\)$`, which does not take the alpha
channel into account.
I changed the pattern to `^rgba?\((\d+),\s*(\d+),\s*(\d+).*\)$`.
This new pattern accepts both `rgb` and `rgba` tuples, and ignores the
alpha channel (that little `.*` at the end) from the sorting criteria.
The reason why I chose to ignore alpha is because when it comes to
kanban colour sorting, only the hue is important; the order of the
panels should stay the same, even if some of them are transparent.
Alternative solutions were discussed in the bug report and are included
here for completeness:
1. Change the regex from ^rgb\((\d+),\s*(\d+),\s*(\d+)\)$ to
^rgba?\((\d+),\s*(\d+),\s*(\d+)(,\s*(\d+(\.\d+)?))?\)$ (alpha channel is
a float or NaN on 5th group) and include the alpha channel in the
sorting criteria.
2. Rethink on why you're reading colours out of the CSS in the first
place, then reformat this sorting procedure.
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Fixes#22178
After this change upload versions with different semver metadata are
treated as the same version and trigger a duplicated version error.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
There are repeated failures with this test which appear related to
failures in getTokenForLoggedInUser. It is difficult to further evaluate
the cause of these failures as we do not get given further information.
This PR will attempt to fix this.
First it adds some extra logging and it uses the csrf cookie primarily
for the csrf value.
If the problem does not occur again with those changes we could merge,
assume that it is fixed and hope that if it occurs in future the
additional logging will be helpful.
If not I will add more changes in attempt to fix.
Fix#22105
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <matti@mdranta.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
- There have been [CI
failures](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/111) in this
specific test function. The code on itself looks good, the CI failures
are likely caused by not specifying any field in `TeamUser`, which might
have caused to unittest to return another `TeamUser` than the code
expects.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
I ran into issues when copy-pasting the docker-compose.yml contents from
https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-with-docker/ - specifically the part
about adding PostgreSQL to the YAML file; I tried manually adding the
diffs by removing the `+` at the beginning of lines, and the resulting
YAML was unparsable.
This forces the indentation to be consistent across all places where
YAML is used.
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
- Update all JS dependencies to latest version
- Enable unicorn/prefer-node-protocol and autofix issues
- Regenerate SVGs
- Add some comments to eslint rules
- Tested build, Mermaid and Katex rendering
For a long time Gitea has tested PR patches using a git apply --check
method, and in fact prior to the introduction of a read-tree assisted
three-way merge in #18004, this was the only way of checking patches.
Since #18004, the git apply --check method has been a fallback method,
only used when the read-tree three-way merge method has detected a
conflict. The read-tree assisted three-way merge method is much faster
and less resource intensive method of detecting conflicts. #18004 kept
the git apply method around because it was thought possible that this
fallback might be able to rectify conflicts that the read-tree three-way
merge detected. I am not certain if this could ever be the case.
Given the uncertainty here and the now relative stability of the
read-tree method - this PR makes using this fallback optional and
disables it by default. The hope is that users will not notice any
significant difference in conflict detection and we will be able to
remove the git apply fallback in future, and/or improve the read-tree
three-way merge method to catch any conflicts that git apply method
might have been able to fix.
An additional benefit is that patch checking should be significantly
less resource intensive and much quicker.
(See
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22083\#issuecomment-1347961737)
Ref #22083
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
The PR #21198 introduced a probable security vulnerability which
resulted in making all storage files be marked as executable.
This PR ensures that these are forcibly marked as non-executable.
Fix#22161
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
As recognised in #21841 the rendering of plain text files is somewhat
incorrect when there are ambiguous characters as the html code is double
escaped. In fact there are several more problems here.
We have a residual isRenderedHTML which is actually simply escaping the
file - not rendering it. This is badly named and gives the wrong
impression.
There is also unusual behaviour whether the file is called a Readme or
not and there is no way to get to the source code if the file is called
README.
In reality what should happen is different depending on whether the file
is being rendered a README at the bottom of the directory view or not.
1. If it is rendered as a README on a directory - it should simply be
escaped and rendered as `<pre>` text.
2. If it is rendered as a file then it should be rendered as source
code.
This PR therefore does:
1. Rename IsRenderedHTML to IsPlainText
2. Readme files rendered at the bottom of the directory are rendered
without line numbers
3. Otherwise plain text files are rendered as source code.
Replace #21841
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
This fixes a bug where, when searching unadopted repositories, active
repositories will be listed as well. This is because the size of the
array of repository names to check is larger by one than the
`IterateBufferSize`.
For an `IterateBufferSize` of 50, the original code will pass 51
repository names but set the query to `LIMIT 50`. If all repositories in
the query are active (i.e. not unadopted) one of them will be omitted
from the result. Due to the `ORDER BY` clause it will be the oldest (or
least recently modified) one.
Bug found in 1.17.3.
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
The recent PR adding orphaned checks to the LFS storage is not
sufficient to completely GC LFS, as it is possible for LFSMetaObjects to
remain associated with repos but still need to be garbage collected.
Imagine a situation where a branch is uploaded containing LFS files but
that branch is later completely deleted. The LFSMetaObjects will remain
associated with the Repository but the Repository will no longer contain
any pointers to the object.
This PR adds a second doctor command to perform a full GC.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Moved files in a patch will result in git apply returning:
```
error: {filename}: No such file or directory
```
This wasn't handled by the git apply patch code. This PR adds handling
for this.
Fix#22083
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
depends on #22094
Fixes https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/77
The old logic did not consider `is_internal`.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Gitea will attempt to lookup its location using LookPath however, this
fails on cmd.exe if gitea is in the current working directory.
exec.LookPath will return an exec.ErrDot error which we can test for and
then simply using filepath.Abs(os.Args[0]) to absolute gitea against the
current working directory.
Fix#22063
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
👋 Hey
I'm new around here, so I may have done some mistakes, sorry!
---
## Context
On a fresh Gitea install, when I go to the [config admin
page](http://localhost:3000/admin/config) I had a 500 error page.
The logs:
```
2022/12/10 20:08:47 ...s/context/context.go:232:HTML() [E] [6394d93f] Render failed: template: admin/config:180:22: executing "admin/config" at <.Service.DefaultAllowOnlyContributorsToTrackTime>: DefaultAllowOnlyContributorsToTrackTime has arguments but cannot be invoked as function
2022/12/10 20:08:47 [6394d93f] router: completed GET /admin/config for [::1]:43800, 500 Internal Server Error in 5.1ms @ admin/config.go:99(admin.Config)
```
## The fix
I removed the `$.Context` on the
`.Service.DefaultAllowOnlyContributorsToTrackTime` to fix the 500 error
page happening. It could be a mistake, and I don't fully understand what
I've done!
Signed-off-by: Restray <contact@restray.org>
Close#14601Fix#3690
Revive of #14601.
Updated to current code, cleanup and added more read/write checks.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Signed-off-by: Andre Bruch <ab@andrebruch.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Norwin <git@nroo.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Fix#22023
I've changed how the percentages for the language statistics are rounded
because they did not always add up to 100%
Now it's done with the largest remainder method, which makes sure that
total is 100%
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
