This fixes a TODO in the code to validate the RedirectURIs when adding
or editing an OAuth application in user settings.
This also includes a refactor of the user settings tests to only create
the DB once per top-level test to avoid reloading fixtures.
There are still some functions under `models` after last big refactor
about `models`. This change will move all team related functions to
service layer with no code change.
## Solves
Currently for rules to re-order them you have to alter the creation
date. so you basicly have to delete and recreate them in the right
order. This is more than just inconvinient ...
## Solution
Add a new col for prioritization
## Demo WebUI Video
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92182a31-9705-4ac5-b6e3-9bb74108cbd1
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
This PR removes (almost) all path tricks, and introduces "renderhelper"
package.
Now we can clearly see the rendering behaviors for comment/file/wiki,
more details are in "renderhelper" tests.
Fix#31411 , fix#18592, fix#25632 and maybe more problems. (ps: fix
#32608 by the way)
This PR rewrites `GetReviewer` function and move it to service layer.
Reviewers should not be watchers, so that this PR removed all watchers
from reviewers. When the repository is under an organization, the pull
request unit read permission will be checked to resolve the bug of
#32394Fix#32394
Resolve#31609
This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the
lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The
existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many
moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while
promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in
supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management
features, such as a change password UI.
Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular
access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2
application.
This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as
nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform
users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead
request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only**
the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and
`groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's
resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already
introduced with [personal
tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g.
`read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...)
Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info,
repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications,
miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read
and/or write permissions.
The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2
Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add
`openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to
authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users
resources.
Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues,
it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and
`read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues.
My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized,
supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and
Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims)
on auth0.com.
I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID`
so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of
additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be
reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is
the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently
the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above.
Screenshots:
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
When running e2e tests on flaky networks, gravatar can cause a timeout
and test failures. Turn off, and populate avatars on e2e test suite run
to make them reliable.
We have some actions that leverage the Gitea API that began receiving
401 errors, with a message that the user was not found. These actions
use the `ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN` env var in the actions job to
authenticate with the Gitea API. The format of this env var in actions
jobs changed with go-gitea/gitea/pull/28885 to be a JWT (with a
corresponding update to `act_runner`) Since it was a JWT, the OAuth
parsing logic attempted to parse it as an OAuth token, and would return
user not found, instead of falling back to look up the running task and
assigning it to the actions user.
Make ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN in action runners could be used,
attempting to parse Oauth JWTs. The code to parse potential old
`ACTION_RUNTIME_TOKEN` was kept in case someone is running an older
version of act_runner that doesn't support the Actions JWT.
- Move models/GetForks to services/FindForks
- Add doer as a parameter of FindForks to check permissions
- Slight performance optimization for get forks API with batch loading
of repository units
- Add tests for forking repository to organizations
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Since there is a status column in the database, the transaction is
unnecessary when downloading an archive. The transaction is blocking
database operations, especially with SQLite.
Replace #27563
In profiling integration tests, I found a couple places where per-test
overhead could be reduced:
* Avoiding disk IO by synchronizing instead of deleting & copying test
Git repository data. This saves ~100ms per test on my machine
* When flushing queues in `PrintCurrentTest`, invoke `FlushWithContext`
in a parallel.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
There were too many patches to the Render system, it's really difficult
to make further improvements.
This PR clears the legacy problems and fix TODOs.
1. Rename `RenderContext.Type` to `RenderContext.MarkupType` to clarify
its usage.
2. Use `ContentMode` to replace `meta["mode"]` and `IsWiki`, to clarify
the rendering behaviors.
3. Use "wiki" mode instead of "mode=gfm + wiki=true"
4. Merge `renderByType` and `renderByFile`
5. Add more comments
----
The problem of "mode=document": in many cases it is not set, so many
non-comment places use comment's hard line break incorrectly
1. move "internal-lfs" route mock to "common-lfs"
2. fine tune tests
3. fix "realm" strings, according to RFC:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2617:
* realm = "realm" "=" realm-value
* realm-value = quoted-string
4. clarify some names of the middlewares, rename `ignXxx` to `optXxx` to
match `reqXxx`, and rename ambiguous `requireSignIn` to `reqGitSignIn`
Refactoring of #32211
this move the PublicOnly() filter calcuation next to the DB querys and
let it be decided by the Doer
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
Resolve#30350
The action unit of mirrors and templates should be disabled by default.
This PR adds `DEFAULT_MIRROR_REPO_UNITS` and
`DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_REPO_UNITS` options to allow users to specify default
units for mirrors and templates.
Thanks to @lng2020 for the
[idea](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/30350#issuecomment-2053942243)
Follow #32460
Now the code could be much clearer than before and easier to maintain. A
lot of legacy code is removed.
Manually tested.
This PR is large enough, that fine tunes could be deferred to the future if
there is no bug found or design problem.
Screenshots:
<details>
</details>
Resolves#32371.
#31970 should have just showed the commit summary, but
`strings.SplitN()` was misused such that we did not perform any
splitting at all and just used the message. This was not caught in the
unit test made in that PR since the test commit summary was > 50 (which
truncated away the commit description).
This snapshot resolves this and adds another unit test to ensure that we
only show the commit summary.
This PR introduces a new event which is similar as Github's. When a new
commit status submitted, the event will be trigged. That means, now we
can receive all feedback from CI/CD system in webhooks or other notify
systems.
ref:
https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#statusFix#20749
- [x] Move `CreateRepositoryByExample` to service layer
- [x] Move `AddCollabrator` to service layer
- [x] Add a new parameter for `AddCollabrator` so that changing mode
immediately after that will become unnecessary.
From testing, I found that issue posters and users with repository write
access are able to edit attachment names in a way that circumvents the
instance-level file extension restrictions using the edit attachment
APIs. This snapshot adds checks for these endpoints.
Use zero instead of 9999-12-31 for deadline
Fix#32291
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
1. clarify the "filepath" could(should) contain "{ref}"
2. remove unclear RepoRefLegacy and RepoRefAny, use RepoRefUnknown to guess
3. by the way, avoid using AppURL
This has two major changes that significantly reduce the amount of work
done for large diffs:
* Kill a running git process when reaching the maximum number of files
in a diff, preventing it from processing the entire diff.
* When loading a diff with the URL param `file-only=true`, skip loading
stats. This speeds up loading both hidden files of a diff and sections
of a diff when clicking the "Show More" button.
A couple of minor things from profiling are also included:
* Reuse existing repo in `PrepareViewPullInfo` if head and base are the
same.
The performance impact is going to depend heavily on the individual diff
and the hardware it runs on, but when testing locally on a diff changing
100k+ lines over hundreds of files, I'm seeing a roughly 75% reduction
in time to load the result of "Show More"
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fix#28121
I did some tests and found that the `missing signature key` error is
caused by an incorrect `Content-Type` header. Gitea correctly sets the
`Content-Type` header when serving files.
348d1d0f32/routers/api/packages/container/container.go (L712-L717)
However, when `SERVE_DIRECT` is enabled, the `Content-Type` header may
be set to an incorrect value by the storage service. To fix this issue,
we can use query parameters to override response header values.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_GetObject.html
<img width="600px"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f2ff90f0-f1df-46f9-9680-b8120222c555"
/>
In this PR, I introduced a new parameter to the `URL` method to support
additional parameters.
```
URL(path, name string, reqParams url.Values) (*url.URL, error)
```
---
Most S3-like services support specifying the content type when storing
objects. However, Gitea always use `application/octet-stream`.
Therefore, I believe we also need to improve the `Save` method to
support storing objects with the correct content type.
b7fb20e73e/modules/storage/minio.go (L214-L221)
This contains two backwards-compatible changes:
* in the lfs http_client, the number of lfs oids requested per batch is
loaded from lfs_client#BATCH_SIZE and defaulted to the previous value of
20
* in the lfs server/service, the max number of lfs oids allowed in a
batch api request is loaded from server#LFS_MAX_BATCH_SIZE and defaults
to 'nil' which equates to the previous behavior of 'infinite'
This fixes#32306
---------
Signed-off-by: Royce Remer <royceremer@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This introduces a new flag `BlockAdminMergeOverride` on the branch
protection rules that prevents admins/repo owners from bypassing branch
protection rules and merging without approvals or failing status checks.
Fixes#17131
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
close#25833
Currently, the information for "requested_reviewers" is only included in
the webhook event for reviews. I would like to suggest adding this
information to the webhook event for "PullRequest comment" as well, as
they both pertain to the "PullRequest" event.
Also, The reviewer information for the Pull Request is not displayed
when it is approved or rejected.
