The value passed into "attachments" sub-template is from
"RedneredContent", so use the same name for consistent. And it makes
readers easy to know its data type.
This PR touches the most interesting part of the "template refactoring".
1. Unclear variable type. Especially for "web/feed/convert.go":
sometimes it uses text, sometimes it uses HTML.
2. Assign text content to "RenderedContent" field, for example: `
project.RenderedContent = project.Description` in web/org/projects.go
3. Assign rendered content to text field, for example: `r.Note =
rendered content` in web/repo/release.go
4. (possible) Incorrectly calling `{{Str2html
.PackageDescriptor.Metadata.ReleaseNotes}}` in
package/content/nuget.tmpl, I guess the name Str2html misleads
developers to use it to "render string to html", but it only sanitizes.
if ReleaseNotes really contains HTML, then this is not a problem.
Some specific events on Gitlab issues and merge requests are stored
separately from comments as "resource state events". With this change,
all relevant resource state events are downloaded during issue and merge
request migration, and converted to comments.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these types.
ref: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/api/resource_state_events.html
Follow #29165
* some of them are incorrect, which would lead to double escaping (eg:
`(print (Escape $.RepoLink)`)
* other of them are not necessary, because `Tr` handles strings&HTML
automatically
Suggest to review by "unified view":
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/29394/files?diff=unified&w=0
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for a new specific kind of event: Changing the
target branch of a PR. When detected, it is downloaded using Gitea's
type for this event, and eventually uploaded into Gitea in the expected
format, i.e. with no text content in the comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of this type.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L102)
GitLab generates "system notes" whenever an event happens within the
platform. Unlike Gitea, those events are stored and retrieved as text
comments with no semantic details. The only way to tell whether a
comment was generated in this manner is the `system` flag on the note
type.
This PR adds detection for two specific kinds of events: Scheduling and
un-scheduling of automatic merges on a PR. When detected, they are
downloaded using Gitea's type for these events, and eventually uploaded
into Gitea in the expected format, i.e. with no text content in the
comment.
This PR also updates the template used to render comments to add support
for migrated comments of these two types.
ref:
11bd6dc826/app/services/system_notes/merge_requests_service.rb (L6-L17)
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)
And help PRs like #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.
- Use maintained fork https://github.com/golangci/misspell
- Rename `mispell-check` to `lint-spell`, add `lint-spell-fix`
- Run `lint-spell` in separate actions step
- Lint more files, fix discovered issues
- Remove inaccurate and outdated info in docs (we do not need GOPATH for
tools anymore)
Maybe later we can add more spellchecking tools, but I have not found
any good ones yet.
When an assignee changed event comment is rendered, most of it is
guarded behind the assignee ID not being 0. However, if it is 0, that
results in quite broken rendering for that comment and the next one.
This can happen, for example, when repository data imported from outside
of Gitea is incomplete.
This PR makes sure comments with an assignee ID of 0 are not rendered at
all.
---
Screenshot before:
<img width="272" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2023-11-05 um 20 12 18"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/42910/7d629d76-fee4-4fe5-9e3a-bf524050cead">
The comments in this screenshot are:
1. A regular text comment
2. A user being unassigned
3. A user being assigned
4. The title of the PR being changed
Comments 2 and 3 are rendered without any text, which indents the next
comment and does not leave enough vertical space.
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
- The review type '22' is a general comment type that is attached to
single codecomments, reviews with multiple comments or to simple approve
and request changes comment. This comment can be used to create a link
towards this action on an pull request.
- Adds an anchor to the review comment type, so that when its getting
linked to it, it actually jumps towards that event.
- This also now fixes the behavior that after you created a review you
will be redirected to that review and because this is an general comment
type other mails will also be 'fixed' such as the approved or request
changes.
- Resolves https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/1248
(cherry picked from commit 1741a5f1fe6adc68bb5f87bdd1c5bdc5bfaa45c7)
---------
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: Caesar Schinas <caesar@caesarschinas.com>
Part of #27065
This PR touches functions used in templates. As templates are not static
typed, errors are harder to find, but I hope I catch it all. I think
some tests from other persons do not hurt.
Each change is tested manually line by line. There are too many changes
so I can't share dozens of screenshots.
In short:
1. `ui right` could be still used in `ui top attached header`, because
there is a special case.
2. A lot of `ui right` are just no-op, so they can be removed safely.
3. Some of the `ui right` should be replaced by `gt-float-right` (to
avoid breaking, leave them to the future).
4. A few of the `ui right` could be rewritten by flex.
this will allow us to fully localize it later
PS: we can not migrate back as the old value was a one-way conversion
prepare for #25213
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
So I found this [linter](https://github.com/Riverside-Healthcare/djlint)
which features a mode for go templates, so I gave it a try and it did
find a number of valid issue, like unbalanced tags etc. It also has a
number of bugs, I had to disable/workaround many issues.
Given that this linter is written in python, this does add a dependency
on `python` >= 3.8 and `poetry` to the development environment to be
able to run this linter locally.
- `e.g.` prefixes on placeholders are removed because the linter had a
false-positive on `placeholder="e.g. cn=Search"` for the `attr=value`
syntax and it's not ideal anyways to write `e.g.` into a placeholder
because a placeholder is meant to hold a sample value.
- In `templates/repo/settings/options.tmpl` I simplified the logic to
not conditionally create opening tags without closing tags because this
stuff confuses the linter (and possibly the reader as well).
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves#2175.
## Screenshots
The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.
## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.
## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration
**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
There was some recent discussion about this in Discord `ui-design`
channel and the conclusion was that
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/24305 should have fixed their
OS font installation to have semibold weights.
I have now tested this 601 weight on a Windows 10 machine on Firefox
myself, and I immediately noticed that bold was excessivly bold and
rendering as 700 because browsers are biased towards bolder fonts. So
revert this back to the previous value.
Clean up a few cases where avatar dimensions were overwritten via CSS,
which were no longer needed or were possible to set via HTML width.
Also included are two small fixes:
- Fix one more case of incorrect avatar offset on review timeline
- Vertically center avatars in review sidebar
There is more to be done here, but some of the work depends on Fomantic
`comment` module removal, or in the case of org member lists, a refactor
of the `avatarlink` template to accept a size.
<img width="371" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/9c5902fb-2b89-4a7d-a152-60e74c3b2c56">
<img width="306" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/115237/c8d92e2a-91c9-4f4a-a7de-6ae1a6bc0479">
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This refactors the `shared/datetime/short|long|full` templates into a
template helper function, which allows us to render absolute date times
within translatable phrases.
- Follows #23988
- The first attempt was in #24055
- This should help #22664
Changes:
1. Added the `DateTime` template helper that replaces the
`shared/datetime/short|long|full` templates
2. Used find-and-replace with varying regexes to replace the templates
from step 1 (for example, `\{\{template "shared/datetime/(\S+) \(dict
"Datetime" ([^"]+) "Fallback" ([^\)]+\)?) ?\)?\}\}` -> `{{DateTime "$1
$2 $3}}`)
3. Used the new `DateTime` helper in the issue due date timestamp
rendering
# Before
# After
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <git@yardenshoham.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Close#24195
Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)
The bug is:
1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview
This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Close: #23738
The actual cause of `500 Internal Server Error` in the issue is not what
is descirbed in the issue.
The actual cause is that after deleting team, if there is a PR which has
requested reivew from the deleted team, the comment could not match with
the deleted team by `assgin_team_id`. So the value of `.AssigneeTeam`
(see below code block) is `nil` which cause `500 error`.
1c8bc4081a/templates/repo/issue/view_content/comments.tmpl (L691-L695)
To fix this bug, there are the following problems to be resolved:
- [x] 1. ~~Stroe the name of the team in `content` column when inserting
`comment` into DB in case that we cannot get the name of team after it
is deleted. But for comments that already exist, just display "Unknown
Team"~~ Just display "Ghost Team" in the comment if the assgined team is
deleted.
- [x] 2. Delete the PR&team binding (the row of which `review_team_id =
${team_id} ` in table `review`) when deleting team.
- [x] 3.For already exist and undeleted binding rows in in table
`review`, ~~we can delete these rows when executing migrations.~~ they
do not affect the function, so won't delete them.
One of the steps in #23328
Before there were 3 different but similar functions: dict/Dict/mergeinto
The code was just copied & pasted, no test.
This PR defines a new stable `dict` function, it covers all the 3 old
functions behaviors, only +160 -171
Future developers do not need to think about or guess the different dict
functions, just use one: `dict`
Why use `dict` but not `Dict`? Because there are far more `dict` than
`Dict` in code already ......
