1
1
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2024-11-14 14:14:25 +00:00
Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
yp05327
a50026e2f3
Fix no edit history after editing issue's title and content (#30814)
Fix #30807

reuse functions in services
2024-05-03 14:11:51 +08:00
JakobDev
aaa1094663
Add the ability to pin Issues (#24406)
This adds the ability to pin important Issues and Pull Requests. You can
also move pinned Issues around to change their Position. Resolves #2175.

## Screenshots

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123207-0aa39869-bb48-45c3-abe2-ba1e836046ec.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235123297-152a16ea-a857-451d-9a42-61f2cd54dd75.png)

![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15185051/235640782-cbfe25ec-6254-479a-a3de-133e585d7a2d.png)

The Design was mostly copied from the Projects Board.

## Implementation
This uses a new `pin_order` Column in the `issue` table. If the value is
set to 0, the Issue is not pinned. If it's set to a bigger value, the
value is the Position. 1 means it's the first pinned Issue, 2 means it's
the second one etc. This is dived into Issues and Pull requests for each
Repo.

## TODO
- [x] You can currently pin as many Issues as you want. Maybe we should
add a Limit, which is configurable. GitHub uses 3, but I prefer 6, as
this is better for bigger Projects, but I'm open for suggestions.
- [x] Pin and Unpin events need to be added to the Issue history.
- [x] Tests
- [x] Migration

**The feature itself is currently fully working, so tester who may find
weird edge cases are very welcome!**

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
2023-05-25 15:17:19 +02:00
谈笑风生间
309354c70e
New webhook trigger for receiving Pull Request review requests (#24481)
close https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/16321

Provided a webhook trigger for requesting someone to review the Pull
Request.

Some modifications have been made to the returned `PullRequestPayload`
based on the GitHub webhook settings, including:
- add a description of the current reviewer object as
`RequestedReviewer` .
- setting the action to either **review_requested** or
**review_request_removed** based on the operation.
- adding the `RequestedReviewers` field to the issues_model.PullRequest.
This field will be loaded into the PullRequest through
`LoadRequestedReviewers()` when `ToAPIPullRequest` is called.

After the Pull Request is merged, I will supplement the relevant
documentation.
2023-05-24 22:06:27 -04:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
qwerty287
1dfa28ffa5
Add API endpoint to get changed files of a PR (#21177)
This adds an api endpoint `/files` to PRs that allows to get a list of changed files.

built upon #18228, reviews there are included
closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/654

Co-authored-by: Anton Bracke <anton@ju60.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-09-29 04:27:20 +02:00
qwerty287
8eb1cd9264
Add "Allow edits from maintainer" feature (#18002)
Adds a feature [like GitHub has](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-from-a-fork) (step 7).
If you create a new PR from a forked repo, you can select (and change later, but only if you are the PR creator/poster) the "Allow edits from maintainers" option.
Then users with write access to the base branch get more permissions on this branch:
* use the update pull request button
* push directly from the command line (`git push`)
* edit/delete/upload files via web UI
* use related API endpoints

You can't merge PRs to this branch with this enabled, you'll need "full" code write permissions.

This feature has a pretty big impact on the permission system. I might forgot changing some things or didn't find security vulnerabilities. In this case, please leave a review or comment on this PR.

Closes #17728

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2022-04-28 17:45:33 +02:00
6543
5814079bf5
Add option to API to update PullRequest base branch (#11666)
* EditPull: add option to change base

Close #11552
2020-06-07 20:13:40 +01:00
6543
dc812f8ba5
Issue/Pull expose IsLocked Property on API (#11708)
Expose IsLocked Property
2020-06-01 22:01:55 +01:00
David Svantesson
7971b05d2b Fix API deadline removal (#8759)
* Handle deadline is zero (to remove deadline)

* Better API documentation for issue deadline.

* Add parameter to unset due date.

* Update pull edit API comment
2019-11-03 22:46:32 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
34eee25bd4
Move sdk structs to modules/structs (#6905)
* move sdk structs to moduels/structs

* fix tests

* fix fmt

* fix swagger

* fix vendor
2019-05-11 18:21:34 +08:00