Follow #33127Fix#8649, fix#639
This is a complete solution. A repo unit could be set to:
* Anonymous read (non-signed-in user)
* Everyone read (signed-in user)
* Everyone write (wiki-only)
Fix#24623
Major changes:
1. Redirect `/owner/repo/blob/*` requests to `/owner/repo/src/commit/*`
(like GitHub)
2. Add a "view file diff" link (see screenshot below)
3. Refactor "AssertHTMLElement" to generic, now we can accurately assert
existence or number.
4. Add more tests
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Modify Diff View FileTree to show all files
## Changes
* removes Show Status button on diff
* uses `git diff-tree` to generate the file tree for the diff
* doesn't reload the diff tree each time we load more files in the
preview
* selecting and unloaded file will keep loading until that file is
loaded
* removes `DiffFileList.vue` and "Show Stats" in diff options
## Open Questions
* selecting and unloaded file will keep loading until that file is
loaded. Is this behaviour okay? It matches what github does.
### Demo
In this demo I set `git.MAX_GIT_DIFF_FILES=1` in my `app.ini` to
demonstrate a worst case example. In most cases the behaviour isn't
nearly as jarring as we load a bunch of files at a time.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/72f29663-d6fc-472d-94fa-7fb5950c2836
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Dear Gitea team,
first of all, thanks for the great work you're doing with this project.
I'm planning to introduce Gitea at a client site, and noticed that while
there is time recording, there are no project-manager-friendly reports
to actually make use of that data, as were also mentioned by others in
#4870#8684 and #13531.
Since I had a little time last weekend, I had put together something
that I hope to be a useful contribution to this great project (while of
course useful for me too).
This PR adds a new "Worktime" tab to the Organisation level. There is a
date range selector (by default set to the current month), and there are
three possible views:
- by repository,
- by milestone, and
- by team member.
Happy to receive any feedback!
There are several possible future improvements of course (predefined
date ranges, charts, a member time sheet, matrix of repos/members, etc)
but I hope that even in this relatively simple state this would be
useful to lots of people.
<img width="1161" alt="Screen Shot 2022-05-25 at 22 12 58"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/118010/170366976-af00c7af-c4f3-4117-86d7-00356d6797a5.png">
Keep up the good work!
Kristof
---------
Co-authored-by: user <user@kk-git1>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
1. Add a OpenTelemetry-like shim-layer to collect traces
2. Add a simple builtin trace collector and exporter, end users could
download the diagnosis report to get the traces.
This PR's design is quite lightweight, no hard-dependency, and it is
easy to improve or remove. We can try it on gitea.com first to see
whether it works well, and fine tune the details.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Fix#33271
Suppose there is a `branch-a` in fork repo:
1. if `branch-a` exists in base repo: try to sync `base:branch-a` to `fork:branch-a`
2. if `branch-a` doesn't exist in base repo: try to sync `base:main` to `fork:branch-a`
1. the error check was added for go-git, it was caused by the empty `.keep` file in the test fixtures.
2. use `PostFormValue` instead of `PostForm.Get` (`Get` needs to parse the form ahead)
3. fix incorrect container text (it should show "Images" in the header but not "OS/Arch")
4. align maven xml
5. fix closed PR color&icon
Currently, anyone with write permissions to a repo are able to rename
default or protected branches.
This change follows
[GitHub's](https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-branches-in-your-repository/renaming-a-branch)
design by only allowing repo/site admins to change these branches.
However, it also follows are current design for protected branches and
only allows admins to modify branch names == branch protection rule
names. Glob-based rules cannot be renamed by anyone (as was already the
case, but we now catch `ErrBranchIsProtected` which we previously did
not catch, throwing a 500).
The `ctx.Repo.RefName` was used to be a "short name", it causes a lot of
ambiguity.
This PR does some refactoring and use `RefFullName` to replace the
legacy `RefName`, and simplify RepoAssignment
This adds links to submodules in diffs, similar to the existing link
when viewing a repo at a specific commit. It does this by expanding diff
parsing to recognize changes to submodules, and find the specific refs
that are added, deleted or changed.
Related #25888
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* htmx updates the input form on branch switch
* add workflow warning to dispatch modal
* use name if description of input is empty
* show error if workflow_dispatch not available on branch
Closes#33073Closes#33099
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Rewrite a lot of legacy strange code, remove duplicate code, remove
jquery, and make these filters reusable.
Let's forget the old code, new code affects:
* issue list open/close switch
* issue list filter (label, author, assignee)
* milestone list open/close switch
* milestone issue list filter (label, author, assignee)
* project view (label, assignee)
- Fixes a translation keystring misuse where the string 'open
milestones' is used in place of 'closed milestones'.
- De-duplicates the use of 'open milesones' and 'closed milestones'
keystrings on the sidebar of an issue, reusing the ones on the issues
filter and action bars.
- Closes#32667
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Provide a cropping tool on the avatar editing page, allowing users to
select the cropping area themselves. This way, users can decide the
displayed area of the image, rather than us deciding for them.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Resolve#31609
This PR was initiated following my personal research to find the
lightest possible Single Sign-On solution for self-hosted setups. The
existing solutions often seemed too enterprise-oriented, involving many
moving parts and services, demanding significant resources while
promising planetary-scale capabilities. Others were adequate in
supporting basic OAuth2 flows but lacked proper user management
features, such as a change password UI.
Gitea hits the sweet spot for me, provided it supports more granular
access permissions for resources under users who accept the OAuth2
application.
This PR aims to introduce granularity in handling user resources as
nonintrusively and simply as possible. It allows third parties to inform
users about their intent to not ask for the full access and instead
request a specific, reduced scope. If the provided scopes are **only**
the typical ones for OIDC/OAuth2—`openid`, `profile`, `email`, and
`groups`—everything remains unchanged (currently full access to user's
resources). Additionally, this PR supports processing scopes already
introduced with [personal
tokens](https://docs.gitea.com/development/oauth2-provider#scopes) (e.g.
`read:user`, `write:issue`, `read:group`, `write:repository`...)
Personal tokens define scopes around specific resources: user info,
repositories, issues, packages, organizations, notifications,
miscellaneous, admin, and activitypub, with access delineated by read
and/or write permissions.
The initial case I wanted to address was to have Gitea act as an OAuth2
Identity Provider. To achieve that, with this PR, I would only add
`openid public-only` to provide access token to the third party to
authenticate the Gitea's user but no further access to the API and users
resources.
Another example: if a third party wanted to interact solely with Issues,
it would need to add `read:user` (for authorization) and
`read:issue`/`write:issue` to manage Issues.
My approach is based on my understanding of how scopes can be utilized,
supported by examples like [Sample Use Cases: Scopes and
Claims](https://auth0.com/docs/get-started/apis/scopes/sample-use-cases-scopes-and-claims)
on auth0.com.
I renamed `CheckOAuthAccessToken` to `GetOAuthAccessTokenScopeAndUserID`
so now it returns AccessTokenScope and user's ID. In the case of
additional scopes in `userIDFromToken` the default `all` would be
reduced to whatever was asked via those scopes. The main difference is
the opportunity to reduce the permissions from `all`, as is currently
the case, to what is provided by the additional scopes described above.
Screenshots:
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
