Add new option:
`visible`: witch can hide a specific field of the form or the created
content afterwards
It is a string array witch can contain `form` and `content`. If only
`form` is present, it wont show up in the created issue afterwards and
the other way around. By default it sets both except for markdown
As they are optional and github don't have any similar thing, it is non
breaking and also do not conflict with it.
With this you can:
- define "post issue creation" elements like a TODO list to track an
issue state
- make sure to have a checkbox that reminds the user to check for a
thing but dont have it in the created issue afterwards
- define markdown for the created issue (was the downside of using yaml
instead of md in the past)
- ...
## Demo
```yaml
name: New Contribution
description: External Contributor creating a pull
body:
- type: checkboxes
id: extern-todo
visible: [form]
attributes:
label: Contribution Guidelines
options:
- label: I checked there exist no similar feature to be extended
required: true
- label: I did read the CONTRIBUTION.MD
required: true
- type: checkboxes
id: intern-todo
visible: [content]
attributes:
label: Maintainer Check-List
options:
- label: Does this pull follow the KISS principe
- label: Checked if internal bord was notifyed
# ....
```
[Demo
Video](https://cloud.obermui.de/s/tm34fSAbJp9qw9z/download/vid-20240220-152751.mkv)
---
*Sponsored by Kithara Software GmbH*
---------
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
For some user (as me), documentation lack of precision about where to
store issue/pr template.
I propose an enhancement about this point. With bold exergue and
precision about server itself.
I've found some user with same interrogation as :
https://forum.gitea.com/t/issue-template-directory/3328
---------
Co-authored-by: Km <cam.lafit@azerttyu.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Add more details for the docker tag when using container registry.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Update `docs/content/administration/backup-and-restore.zh-cn.md`
`docs/content/contributing/guidelines-frontend.zh-cn.md`
`docs/content/help/support.zh-cn.md`
`docs/content/installation/database-preparation.zh-cn.md`
`docs/content/installation/windows-service.zh-cn.md`
`docs/content/usage/profile-readme.zh-cn.md` to be consistent with the
English document
According to [Debian
docs](https://wiki.debian.org/DebianRepository/UseThirdParty):
> The certificate MUST NOT be placed in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d or loaded
by apt-key add.
> ...
> If future updates to the certificate will be managed by an apt/dpkg
package as recommended below, then it SHOULD be downloaded into
/usr/share/keyrings using the same filename that will be provided by the
package. If it will be managed locally , it SHOULD be downloaded into
/etc/apt/keyrings instead.
> ...
> A sources.list entry SHOULD have the signed-by option set.
Update more actions to use nodejs20 runtime and also update the docs for
checkout action usage.
similar to:
- #27836
- #27096
---------
Signed-off-by: Rui Chen <rui@chenrui.dev>
Several fields in the "Verify group membership in LDAP" docs were
confusingly titled when compared to the actual fields in the
application, this change rectifies that by matching the docs to the
fields already present in gitea.
Signed-off-by: David Hulick <dave.hulick@gmail.com>
https://gitea.com/gitea/gitea-docusaurus/actions/runs/661/jobs/0#jobstep-9-39
I noticed that there are many warning logs in building docs.
It is causing 404 in docs.gitea.com now, so we need to fix it.
And there are also some other problems in v1.19 which can not be done in
this PR.
ps: Are there any good methods to test this in local?
The bug has been fixed for several months in the
`docker/build-push-action`
The fix commit is
[d8823bfaed](d8823bfaed)
as the Gitea Actions Doc mentioned too.
Closes#26329
This PR adds the ability to ignore revisions specified in the
`.git-blame-ignore-revs` file in the root of the repository.
The banner is displayed in this case. I intentionally did not add a UI
way to bypass the ignore file (same behaviour as Github) but you can add
`?bypass-blame-ignore=true` to the url manually.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Hello,
The current package guide for cargo gives you only the git index, with
the HTTP Index stabilized being used as default for crates.io and being
better for most use-cases.
However, it's not documented that gitea supports the sparse spec, and it
does not require the _crates-index git repo for the sparse api.
I personally think we should push users to use the sparse instead of the
git repository. (Even let users disable crates-index repos if they only
want to use sparse)
copy and modified from #14572
> Whilst debating enforcing MFA within our team, I realised there isn't
a lot of context to the side effects of enabling it. Most of us use Git
over HTTP and would need to add a token.
I plan to add another PR that adds a sentence to the UI about needing to
generate a token when enabling MFA if HTTP is to be used.
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
