When releasing, the releaser should read all the pull requests carefully
and do some adjustments because some of pull requests' labels are not
right when it's merged.
And the changelog tool needs to be adjusted. If one pull request has
both `bug` and `API`, it should mark it as `bug` but not `API`.
- The Wiki page did not sanitize author name
- the reviewer name on a "dismiss review" comment is also affected
- the migration page has some spots
---------
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Backport #29295 by @lunny
Fix#28843
This PR will bypass the pushUpdateTag to database failure when
syncAllTags. An error log will be recorded.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes#28945
Backport #28948
Setting the avatar is wrong and creating a random password is equal to
leave it empty.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #29277 by @Zettat123
Fix#29175
Replace #29207
This PR makes some improvements to the `issue_comment` workflow trigger
event.
1. Fix the bug that pull requests cannot trigger `issue_comment`
workflows
2. Previously the `issue_comment` event only supported the `created`
activity type. This PR adds support for the missing `edited` and
`deleted` activity types.
3. Some events (including `issue_comment`, `issues`, etc. ) only trigger
workflows that belong to the workflow file on the default branch. This
PR introduces the `IsDefaultBranchWorkflow` function to check for these
events.
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Backport #29297 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes#29101
Related #29298
Discard all read data to prevent misinterpreting existing data. Some
discard calls were missing in error cases.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #29173Fix#29166
Add support for the following activity types of `pull_request`
- assigned
- unassigned
- review_requested
- review_request_removed
- milestoned
- demilestoned
Backport #29298
Fixes the reason why #29101 is hard to replicate.
Related #29297
Create a repo with a file with minimum size 4097 bytes (I use 10000) and
execute the following code:
```go
gitRepo, err := gitrepo.OpenRepository(db.DefaultContext, <repo>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(<sha>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
entry, err := commit.GetTreeEntryByPath(<file>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
b := entry.Blob()
// Create a reader
r, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err)
defer r.Close()
// Create a second reader
r2, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err) // Should be no error but is ErrNotExist
defer r2.Close()
```
The problem is the check in `CatFileBatch`:
79217ea63c/modules/git/repo_base_nogogit.go (L81-L87)
`Buffered() > 0` is used to check if there is a "operation" in progress
at the moment. This is a problem because we can't control the internal
buffer in the `bufio.Reader`. The code above demonstrates a sequence
which initiates an operation for which the code thinks there is no
active processing. The second call to `DataAsync()` therefore reuses the
existing instances instead of creating a new batch reader.
The bug has been fixed on v1.22 but not backport to v1.21.
This original PR have many refactors so I don't think it's necessary to
backport all of them.
Fix#28667
For some user (as me), documentation lack of precision about where to
store issue/pr template.
I propose an enhancement about this point. With bold exergue and
precision about server itself.
I've found some user with same interrogation as :
https://forum.gitea.com/t/issue-template-directory/3328
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #29203
Relates to #28654, #29039 and #29050.
The "show outdated comments" flag should only apply to the file diff
view.
On the PR timeline, outdated comments are always shown. So they should
also be loaded when (un)resolving a conversation on the timeline page.
Backport #29155 with an extra change: tolerate the git 2.43.1 GIT_FLUSH
bug in Gitea 1.21.x, more details in the comment of repo_attribute.go
Manually tested with git 2.43.1 and an old git (2.39.2)
Backport clean cherry-picks of
9c39f8515f
and
c7a21cbb0c
onto 1.21.
- Use maintained fork https://github.com/golangci/misspell
- Rename `mispell-check` to `lint-spell`, add `lint-spell-fix`
- Run `lint-spell` in separate actions step
- Lint more files, fix discovered issues
- Remove inaccurate and outdated info in docs (we do not need GOPATH for
tools anymore)
Maybe later we can add more spellchecking tools, but I have not found
any good ones yet.
Backport #29069
The old code `GetTemplatesFromDefaultBranch(...) ([]*api.IssueTemplate,
map[string]error)` doesn't really follow Golang's habits, then the
second returned value might be misused. For example, the API function
`GetIssueTemplates` incorrectly checked the second returned value and
always responds 500 error.
This PR refactors GetTemplatesFromDefaultBranch to
ParseTemplatesFromDefaultBranch and clarifies its behavior, and fixes
the API endpoint bug, and adds some tests.
And by the way, add proper prefix `X-` for the header generated in
`checkDeprecatedAuthMethods`, because non-standard HTTP headers should
have `X-` prefix, and it is also consistent with the new code in
`GetIssueTemplates`
Backport #29054. Fix#28840
This backport is for 1.21 only and it is different from the change in
1.22: this backport still accept the legacy date format to avoid
breaking.
Backport #29085 by @silverwind
When setting `url.host` on a URL object with no port specified (like is
the case of default port), the resulting URL's port will not change.
Workaround this quirk in the URL standard by explicitely setting port
for the http and https protocols.
Extracted the logic to a function for the purpose of testing. Initially
I wanted to have the function in utils.js, but it turns out esbuild can
not treeshake the unused functions which would result in the
webcomponents chunk having all 2kB utils.js inlined, so it seemed not
worth.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/29084
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #29050 by wxiaoguang
Try to improve #28949
1. Make `ctx.Data["ShowOutdatedComments"] = true` by default: it brings
consistent user experience, and sometimes the "outdated (source
changed)" comments are still valuable.
2. Show a friendly message if the comment won't show, then the end users
won't fell that "the comment disappears" (it is the special case when
`ShowOutdatedComments = false`)
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #29062 by @inferno-umar
Fix for gitea putting everything into one request without batching and
sending it to Elasticsearch for indexing as issued in #28117
This issue occured in large repositories while Gitea tries to
index the code using ElasticSearch.
Co-authored-by: dark-angel <70754989+inferno-umar@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #29039 by wxiaoguang
Follow #28654
The `comments` might be empty, so the templates shouldn't (and couldn't)
use it to render. When there is no comment, the UI should also be
updated to empty, so returning an empty body is good enough.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
