Close#24195
Some of the changes are taken from my another fix
f07b0de997
in #20147 (although that PR was discarded ....)
The bug is:
1. The old code doesn't handle `removedfile` event correctly
2. The old code doesn't provide attachments for type=CommentTypeReview
This PR doesn't intend to refactor the "upload" code to a perfect state
(to avoid making the review difficult), so some legacy styles are kept.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Close: #23738
The actual cause of `500 Internal Server Error` in the issue is not what
is descirbed in the issue.
The actual cause is that after deleting team, if there is a PR which has
requested reivew from the deleted team, the comment could not match with
the deleted team by `assgin_team_id`. So the value of `.AssigneeTeam`
(see below code block) is `nil` which cause `500 error`.
1c8bc4081a/templates/repo/issue/view_content/comments.tmpl (L691-L695)
To fix this bug, there are the following problems to be resolved:
- [x] 1. ~~Stroe the name of the team in `content` column when inserting
`comment` into DB in case that we cannot get the name of team after it
is deleted. But for comments that already exist, just display "Unknown
Team"~~ Just display "Ghost Team" in the comment if the assgined team is
deleted.
- [x] 2. Delete the PR&team binding (the row of which `review_team_id =
${team_id} ` in table `review`) when deleting team.
- [x] 3.For already exist and undeleted binding rows in in table
`review`, ~~we can delete these rows when executing migrations.~~ they
do not affect the function, so won't delete them.
This allows for usernames, and emails connected to them to be reserved
and not reused.
Use case, I manage an instance with open registration, and sometimes
when users are deleted for spam (or other purposes), their usernames are
freed up and they sign up again with the same information.
This could also be used to reserve usernames, and block them from being
registered (in case an instance would like to block certain things
without hardcoding the list in code and compiling from scratch).
This is an MVP, that will allow for future work where you can set
something as reserved via the interface.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
As promised in #23817, I have this made a PR to make Release Download
URLs predictable. It currently follows the schema
`<repo>/releases/download/<tag>/<filename>`. this already works, but it
is nowhere shown in the UI or the API. The Problem is, that it is
currently possible to have multiple files with the same name (why do we
even allow this) for a release. I had written some Code to check, if a
Release has 2 or more files with the same Name. If yes, it uses the old
`attachments/<uuid>` URlL if no it uses the new fancy URL.
I had also changed `<repo>/releases/download/<tag>/<filename>` to
directly serve the File instead of redirecting, so people who who use
automatic update checker don't end up with the `attachments/<uuid>` URL.
Fixes#10919
---------
Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Without this patch, the setting SSH.StartBuiltinServer decides whether
the native (Go) implementation is used rather than calling 'ssh-keygen'.
It's possible for 'using ssh-keygen' and 'using the built-in server' to
be independent.
In fact, the gitea rootless container doesn't ship ssh-keygen and can be
configured to use the host's SSH server - which will cause the public
key parsing mechanism to break.
This commit changes the decision to be based on SSH.KeygenPath instead.
Any existing configurations with a custom KeygenPath set will continue
to function. The new default value of '' selects the native version. The
downside of this approach is that anyone who has relying on plain
'ssh-keygen' to have special properties will now be using the native
version instead.
I assume the exec-variant is only there because /x/crypto/ssh didn't
support ssh-ed25519 until 2016. I don't see any other reason for using
it so it might be an acceptable risk.
Fixes#23363
EDIT: this message was garbled when I tried to get the commit
description back in.. Trying to reconstruct it:
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️ Users who don't have SSH.KeygenPath
explicitly set and rely on the ssh-keygen binary need to set
SSH.KeygenPath to 'ssh-keygen' in order to be able to continue using it
for public key parsing.
There was something else but I can't remember at the moment.
EDIT2: It was about `make test` and `make lint`. Can't get them to run.
To reproduce the issue, I installed `golang` in `docker.io/node:16` and
got:
```
...
go: mvdan.cc/xurls/v2@v2.4.0: unknown revision mvdan.cc/xurls/v2.4.0
go: gotest.tools/v3@v3.4.0: unknown revision gotest.tools/v3.4.0
...
go: gotest.tools/v3@v3.0.3: unknown revision gotest.tools/v3.0.3
...
go: error loading module requirements
```
Signed-off-by: Leon M. Busch-George <leon@georgemail.eu>
Right now the authors search dropdown might take a long time to load if
amount of authors is huge.
Example: (In the video below, there are about 10000 authors, and it
takes about 10 seconds to open the author dropdown)
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/229422229-98aa9656-3439-4f8c-9f4e-83bd8e2a2557.mov
Possible improvements can be made, which will take 2 steps (Thanks to
@wolfogre for advice):
Step 1：
Backend: Add a new api, which returns a limit of 30 posters with matched
prefix.
Frontend: Change the search behavior from frontend search(fomantic
search) to backend search(when input is changed, send a request to get
authors matching the current search prefix)
Step 2：
Backend: Optimize the api in step 1 using indexer to support fuzzy
search.
This PR is implements the first step. The main changes:
1. Added api: `GET /{type:issues|pulls}/posters` , which return a limit
of 30 users with matched prefix (prefix sent as query). If
`DEFAULT_SHOW_FULL_NAME` in `custom/conf/app.ini` is set to true, will
also include fullnames fuzzy search.
2. Added a tooltip saying "Shows a maximum of 30 users" to the author
search dropdown
3. Change the search behavior from frontend search to backend search
After:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/229430960-f88fafd8-fd5d-4f84-9df2-2677539d5d08.mov
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22586
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
There is no fork concept in agit flow, anyone with read permission can
push `refs/for/<target-branch>/<topic-branch>` to the repo. So we should
treat it as a fork pull request because it may be from an untrusted
user.
At first, we have one unified team unit permission which is called
`Team.Authorize` in DB.
But since https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/17811, we allowed
different units to have different permission.
The old code is only designed for the old version. So after #17811, if
org users have write permission of other units, but have no permission
of packages, they can also get write permission of packages.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
The old code just parses an invalid key to `TypeInvalid` and uses it as
normal, and duplicate keys will be kept.
So this PR will ignore invalid key and log warning and also deduplicate
valid units.
I neglected that the `NameKey` of `Unit` is not only for translation,
but also configuration. So it should be `repo.actions` to maintain
consistency.
## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️
If users already use `actions.actions` in `DISABLED_REPO_UNITS` or
`DEFAULT_REPO_UNITS`, it will be treated as an invalid unit key.
Adds API endpoints to manage issue/PR dependencies
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` List issues that are
blocked by this issue
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Block the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/blocks` Unblock the issue
given in the body by the issue in path
* `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` List an
issue's dependencies
* `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Create a new
issue dependencies
* `DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies` Remove an
issue dependency
Closes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/15393Closes#22115
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Since #23493 has conflicts with latest commits, this PR is my proposal
for fixing #23371
Details are in the comments
And refactor the `modules/options` module, to make it always use
"filepath" to access local files.
Benefits:
* No need to do `util.CleanPath(strings.ReplaceAll(p, "\\", "/"))),
"/")` any more (not only one before)
* The function behaviors are clearly defined
A part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22865
At first, I think we do not need 3 ProjectTypes, as we can check user
type, but it seems that it is not database friendly.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
This PR fixes the tags sort issue mentioned in #23432
The tags on dropdown shoud be sorted in descending order of time but are
not. Because when getting tags, it execeutes `git tag sort
--sort=-taggerdate`. Git supports two types of tags: lightweight and
annotated, and `git tag sort --sort=-taggerdate` dosen't work with
lightweight tags, which will not give correct result. This PR add
`GetTagNamesByRepoID ` to get tags from the database so the tags are
sorted.
Also adapt this change to the droplist when comparing branches.
Dropdown places:
<img width="369" alt="截屏2023-03-15 14 25 39"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/225224506-65a72e50-4c11-41d7-8187-a7e9c7dab2cb.png">
<img width="675" alt="截屏2023-03-15 14 25 27"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17645053/225224526-65ce8008-340c-43f6-aa65-b6bd9e1a1bf1.png">
`namedBlob` turned out to be a poor imitation of a `TreeEntry`. Using
the latter directly shortens this code.
This partially undoes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23152/,
which I found a merge conflict with, and also expands the test it added
to cover the subtle README-in-a-subfolder case.
this is a simple endpoint that adds the ability to rename users to the
admin API.
Note: this is not in a mergeable state. It would be better if this was
handled by a PATCH/POST to the /api/v1/admin/users/{username} endpoint
and the username is modified.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
