1
1
mirror of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea synced 2024-11-15 22:54:24 +00:00
Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lunny Xiao
f9cfd6ce5b
Use the type RefName for all the needed places and fix pull mirror sync bugs (#24634)
This PR replaces all string refName as a type `git.RefName` to make the
code more maintainable.

Fix #15367
Replaces #23070 
It also fixed a bug that tags are not sync because `git remote --prune
origin` will not remove local tags if remote removed.

We in fact should use `git fetch --prune --tags origin` but not `git
remote update origin` to do the sync.

Some answer from ChatGPT as ref.

> If the git fetch --prune --tags command is not working as expected,
there could be a few reasons why. Here are a few things to check:
> 
>Make sure that you have the latest version of Git installed on your
system. You can check the version by running git --version in your
terminal. If you have an outdated version, try updating Git and see if
that resolves the issue.
> 
>Check that your Git repository is properly configured to track the
remote repository's tags. You can check this by running git config
--get-all remote.origin.fetch and verifying that it includes
+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*. If it does not, you can add it by running git
config --add remote.origin.fetch "+refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*".
> 
>Verify that the tags you are trying to prune actually exist on the
remote repository. You can do this by running git ls-remote --tags
origin to list all the tags on the remote repository.
> 
>Check if any local tags have been created that match the names of tags
on the remote repository. If so, these local tags may be preventing the
git fetch --prune --tags command from working properly. You can delete
local tags using the git tag -d command.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-05-26 01:04:48 +00:00
delvh
0f4e1b9ac6
Restructure webhook module (#22256)
Previously, there was an `import services/webhooks` inside
`modules/notification/webhook`.
This import was removed (after fighting against many import cycles).
Additionally, `modules/notification/webhook` was moved to
`modules/webhook`,
and a few structs/constants were extracted from `models/webhooks` to
`modules/webhook`.

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-01-01 23:23:15 +08:00
flynnnnnnnnnn
e81ccc406b
Implement FSFE REUSE for golang files (#21840)
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.

Fix #16132

Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2022-11-27 18:20:29 +00:00
oliverpool
b6e81357bd
Add Webhook authorization header (#20926)
_This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_

## Context

In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:

- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872)
- TeamCity #18667
- Gitea instances #20267
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)

## Proposed solution

Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307).

This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872.

As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):


![2022-08-23-142911](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/186162483-5b721504-eef5-4932-812e-eb96a68494cc.png)

The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.

## Questions

- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind 
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~

## Done as well:

- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there


_Closes #19872_

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-03 20:23:20 +02:00
KN4CK3R
cad9adeff4
Display total commit count in hook message (#21400)
Fixes #21379

The commits are capped by `setting.UI.FeedMaxCommitNum` so
`len(commits)` is not the correct number. So this PR adds a new
`TotalCommits` field.

Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2022-10-17 00:22:34 +08:00
Akshay Mankar
f0aed8205b
Fix formatted link for PR review notifications to matrix (#21319)
The PR review notifications HTML was written as markdown due to not
using `MatrixLinkFormatter`.
2022-10-07 22:06:34 +01:00
Aaron F
3963625b6e
Webhook for Wiki changes (#20219)
Add support for triggering webhook notifications on wiki changes.

This PR contains frontend and backend for webhook notifications on wiki actions (create a new page, rename a page, edit a page and delete a page). The frontend got a new checkbox under the Custom Event -> Repository Events section. There is only one checkbox for create/edit/rename/delete actions, because it makes no sense to separate it and others like releases or packages follow the same schema.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018803-26851196-831f-4fde-9a4c-9e639b0e0d6b.png)

The actions itself are separated, so that different notifications will be executed (with the "action" field). All the webhook receivers implement the new interface method (Wiki) and the corresponding tests.

When implementing this, I encounter a little bug on editing a wiki page. Creating and editing a wiki page is technically the same action and will be handled by the ```updateWikiPage``` function. But the function need to know if it is a new wiki page or just a change. This distinction is done by the ```action``` parameter, but this will not be sent by the frontend (on form submit). This PR will fix this by adding the ```action``` parameter with the values ```_new``` or ```_edit```, which will be used by the ```updateWikiPage``` function.

I've done integration tests with matrix and gitea (http).

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/121972/177018795-eb5cdc01-9ba3-483e-a6b7-ed0e313a71fb.png)

Fix #16457

Signed-off-by: Aaron Fischer <mail@aaron-fischer.net>
2022-09-04 20:54:23 +01:00
6543
54e9ee37a7
format with gofumpt (#18184)
* gofumpt -w -l .

* gofumpt -w -l -extra .

* Add linter

* manual fix

* change make fmt
2022-01-20 18:46:10 +01:00
Gusted
ff2fd08228
Simplify parameter types (#18006)
Remove repeated type declarations in function definitions.
2021-12-20 04:41:31 +00:00
zeripath
bbffcc3aec
Multiple Escaping Improvements (#17551)
There are multiple places where Gitea does not properly escape URLs that it is building and there are multiple places where it builds urls when there is already a simpler function available to use this.
    
This is an extensive PR attempting to fix these issues.

1. The first commit in this PR looks through all href, src and links in the Gitea codebase and has attempted to catch all the places where there is potentially incomplete escaping.
2. Whilst doing this we will prefer to use functions that create URLs over recreating them by hand.
3. All uses of strings should be directly escaped - even if they are not currently expected to contain escaping characters. The main benefit to doing this will be that we can consider relaxing the constraints on user names and reponames in future. 
4. The next commit looks at escaping in the wiki and re-considers the urls that are used there. Using the improved escaping here wiki files containing '/'. (This implementation will currently still place all of the wiki files the root directory of the repo but this would not be difficult to change.)
5. The title generation in feeds is now properly escaped.
6. EscapePound is no longer needed - urls should be PathEscaped / QueryEscaped as necessary but then re-escaped with Escape when creating html with locales Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
2021-11-16 18:18:25 +00:00
Lunny Xiao
33fca2b537
Move webhook into models/webhook/ (#17579) 2021-11-10 13:13:16 +08:00
Lunny Xiao
9f31f3aa8a
Add an abstract json layout to make it's easier to change json library (#16528)
* Add an abstract json layout to make it's easier to change json library

* Fix import

* Fix import sequence

* Fix blank lines

* Fix blank lines
2021-07-24 18:03:58 +02:00
KN4CK3R
9b1b4b5433
Refactor Webhook + Add X-Hub-Signature (#16176)
This PR removes multiple unneeded fields from the `HookTask` struct and adds the two headers `X-Hub-Signature` and `X-Hub-Signature-256`.

## ⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️ 

* The `Secret` field is no longer passed as part of the payload.
* "Breaking" change (or fix?): The webhook history shows the real called url and not the url registered in the webhook (`deliver.go`@129).

Close #16115
Fixes #7788
Fixes #11755

Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2021-06-27 20:21:09 +01:00
zeripath
f0e15250b9
Migrate to use jsoniter instead of encoding/json (#14841)
* Migrate to use jsoniter

* fix tests

* update gitea.com/go-chi/binding

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
2021-03-01 22:08:10 +01:00
Lunny Xiao
42354dfe45
Move webhook type from int to string (#13664)
* Move webhook type from int to string

* rename webhook_services

* finish refactor

* Fix merge

* Ignore unnecessary ci

Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
2020-12-08 11:41:14 +01:00