Old code is not consistent for generating & decoding the JWT secrets.
Now, the callers only need to use 2 consistent functions:
NewJwtSecretWithBase64 and DecodeJwtSecretBase64
And remove a non-common function Base64FixedDecode from util.go
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)
And help PRs like #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.
Introduce a new function checkGitVersionCompatibility, when the git
version can't be used by Gitea, tell the end users to downgrade or
upgrade. The refactored functions are related to make the code easier to
test.
And simplify the comments for "safe.directory"
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
With this option, it is possible to require a linear commit history with
the following benefits over the next best option `Rebase+fast-forward`:
The original commits continue existing, with the original signatures
continuing to stay valid instead of being rewritten, there is no merge
commit, and reverting commits becomes easier.
Closes#24906
Replace #28849. Thanks to @yp05327 for the looking into the problem.
Fix#28840
The old behavior of newSignatureFromCommitline is not right. The new
parseSignatureFromCommitLine:
1. never fails
2. only accept one format (if there is any other, it could be easily added)
And add some tests.
Try to improve #28949
1. Make `ctx.Data["ShowOutdatedComments"] = true` by default: it brings
consistent user experience, and sometimes the "outdated (source
changed)" comments are still valuable.
2. Show a friendly message if the comment won't show, then the end users
won't fell that "the comment disappears" (it is the special case when
`ShowOutdatedComments = false`)
Fix for gitea putting everything into one request without batching and
sending it to Elasticsearch for indexing as issued in #28117
This issue occured in large repositories while Gitea tries to
index the code using ElasticSearch.
I've applied necessary changes that takes batch length from below config
(app.ini)
```
[queue.code_indexer]
BATCH_LENGTH=<length_int>
```
and batches all requests to Elasticsearch in chunks as configured in the
above config
Resolves https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28704
Example of an entry in the generated `APKINDEX` file:
```
C:Q1xCO3H9LTTEbhKt9G1alSC87I56c=
P:hello
V:2.12-r1
A:x86_64
T:The GNU Hello program produces a familiar, friendly greeting
U:https://www.gnu.org/software/hello/
L:GPL-3.0-or-later
S:15403
I:36864
o:hello
m:
t:1705934118
D:so:libc.musl-x86_64.so.1
p:cmd:hello=2.12-r1
i:foobar=1.0 !baz
k:42
```
the `i:` and `k:` entries are new.
---------
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Fixes#28660
Fixes an admin api bug related to `user.LoginSource`
Fixed `/user/emails` response not identical to GitHub api
This PR unifies the user update methods. The goal is to keep the logic
only at one place (having audit logs in mind). For example, do the
password checks only in one method not everywhere a password is updated.
After that PR is merged, the user creation should be next.
In #28691, schedule plans will be deleted when a repo's actions unit is
disabled. But when the unit is enabled, the schedule plans won't be
created again.
This PR fixes the bug. The schedule plans will be created again when the
actions unit is re-enabled
Renames it to `ENABLED` to be consistent with other settings and
deprecates it.
I believe this change is necessary because other setting groups such as
`attachment`, `cors`, `mailer`, etc. have an `ENABLED` setting, but
`oauth2` is the only one with an `ENABLE` setting, which could cause
confusion for users.
This is no longer a breaking change because `ENABLE` has been set as
deprecated and as an alias to `ENABLED`.
## Purpose
This is a refactor toward building an abstraction over managing git
repositories.
Afterwards, it does not matter anymore if they are stored on the local
disk or somewhere remote.
## What this PR changes
We used `git.OpenRepository` everywhere previously.
Now, we should split them into two distinct functions:
Firstly, there are temporary repositories which do not change:
```go
git.OpenRepository(ctx, diskPath)
```
Gitea managed repositories having a record in the database in the
`repository` table are moved into the new package `gitrepo`:
```go
gitrepo.OpenRepository(ctx, repo_model.Repo)
```
Why is `repo_model.Repository` the second parameter instead of file
path?
Because then we can easily adapt our repository storage strategy.
The repositories can be stored locally, however, they could just as well
be stored on a remote server.
## Further changes in other PRs
- A Git Command wrapper on package `gitrepo` could be created. i.e.
`NewCommand(ctx, repo_model.Repository, commands...)`. `git.RunOpts{Dir:
repo.RepoPath()}`, the directory should be empty before invoking this
method and it can be filled in the function only. #28940
- Remove the `RepoPath()`/`WikiPath()` functions to reduce the
possibility of mistakes.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
The `ToUTF8*` functions were stripping BOM, while BOM is actually valid
in UTF8, so the stripping must be optional depending on use case. This
does:
- Add a options struct to all `ToUTF8*` functions, that by default will
strip BOM to preserve existing behaviour
- Remove `ToUTF8` function, it was dead code
- Rename `ToUTF8WithErr` to `ToUTF8`
- Preserve BOM in Monaco Editor
- Remove a unnecessary newline in the textarea value. Browsers did
ignore it, it seems but it's better not to rely on this behaviour.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28743
Related: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/6716 which seems to
have once introduced a mechanism that strips and re-adds the BOM, but
from what I can tell, this mechanism was removed at some point after
that PR.
Fix#22066
# Purpose
This PR fix the releases will be deleted when mirror repository sync the
tags.
# The problem
In the previous implementation of #19125. All releases record in
databases of one mirror repository will be deleted before sync.
Ref:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19125/files#diff-2aa04998a791c30e5a02b49a97c07fcd93d50e8b31640ce2ddb1afeebf605d02R481
# The Pros
This PR introduced a new method which will load all releases from
databases and all tags on git data into memory. And detect which tags
needs to be inserted, which tags need to be updated or deleted. Only
tags releases(IsTag=true) which are not included in git data will be
deleted, only tags which sha1 changed will be updated. So it will not
delete any real releases include drafts.
# The Cons
The drawback is the memory usage will be higher than before if there are
many tags on this repository. This PR defined a special release struct
to reduce columns loaded from database to memory.
This should fix https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28927
Technically older versions of Git would support this flag as well, but
per https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/28466 that's the version
where using it (object-format=sha256) left "experimental" state.
`sha1` is (currently) the default, so older clients should be unaffected
in either case.
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
When LFS hooks are present in gitea-repositories, operations like git
push for creating a pull request fail. These repositories are not meant
to include LFS files or git push them, that is handled separately. And
so they should not have LFS hooks.
Installing git-lfs on some systems (like Debian Linux) will
automatically set up /etc/gitconfig to create LFS hooks in repositories.
For most git commands in Gitea this is not a problem, either because
they run on a temporary clone or the git command does not create LFS
hooks.
But one case where this happens is git archive for creating repository
archives. To fix that, add a GIT_CONFIG_NOSYSTEM=1 to disable using the
system configuration for that command.
According to a comment, GIT_CONFIG_NOSYSTEM is not used for all git
commands because the system configuration can be intentionally set up
for Gitea to use.
Resolves#19810, #21148
Sometimes you need to work on a feature which depends on another (unmerged) feature.
In this case, you may create a PR based on that feature instead of the main branch.
Currently, such PRs will be closed without the possibility to reopen in case the parent feature is merged and its branch is deleted.
Automatic target branch change make life a lot easier in such cases.
Github and Bitbucket behave in such way.
Example:
$PR_1$: main <- feature1
$PR_2$: feature1 <- feature2
Currently, merging $PR_1$ and deleting its branch leads to $PR_2$ being closed without the possibility to reopen.
This is both annoying and loses the review history when you open a new PR.
With this change, $PR_2$ will change its target branch to main ($PR_2$: main <- feature2) after $PR_1$ has been merged and its branch has been deleted.
This behavior is enabled by default but can be disabled.
For security reasons, this target branch change will not be executed when merging PRs targeting another repo.
Fixes#27062Fixes#18408
---------
Co-authored-by: Denys Konovalov <kontakt@denyskon.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Fixes#26548
This PR refactors the rendering of markup links. The old code uses
`strings.Replace` to change some urls while the new code uses more
context to decide which link should be generated.
The added tests should ensure the same output for the old and new
behaviour (besides the bug).
We may need to refactor the rendering a bit more to make it clear how
the different helper methods render the input string. There are lots of
options (resolve links / images / mentions / git hashes / emojis / ...)
but you don't really know what helper uses which options. For example,
we currently support images in the user description which should not be
allowed I think:
<details>
<summary>Profile</summary>
https://try.gitea.io/KN4CK3R
</details>
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes#27114.
* In Gitea 1.12 (#9532), a "dismiss stale approvals" branch protection
setting was introduced, for ignoring stale reviews when verifying the
approval count of a pull request.
* In Gitea 1.14 (#12674), the "dismiss review" feature was added.
* This caused confusion with users (#25858), as "dismiss" now means 2
different things.
* In Gitea 1.20 (#25882), the behavior of the "dismiss stale approvals"
branch protection was modified to actually dismiss the stale review.
For some users this new behavior of dismissing the stale reviews is not
desirable.
So this PR reintroduces the old behavior as a new "ignore stale
approvals" branch protection setting.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
