* Add pager to the branches page
* override pageSize if bigger than max
* Make branches commit range configurable
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
* Replace more icons with SVG
- Replace remaining icons on admin page with SVG
- Fix vertical menu background on arc-green
- Minor improvments to frontpage repo search
- More icon replacements here and there
* fix integration
* whitespace tweak
* add comment
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Add class to page content to unify top margin
Previously pages would individually set this margin but some didn't so
content would stick to the header without any space. Resolve this by
adding a new class that is added on all pages. The only place where we
remove this margin again is on the pages with menu or wrapper in the
header.
* fix admin notices
* fix team pages
* fix loading segment on gitgraph for arc-green
* fix last missing case
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Make archival asynchronous
The prime benefit being sought here is for large archives to not
clog up the rendering process and cause unsightly proxy timeouts.
As a secondary benefit, archive-in-progress is moved out of the
way into a /tmp file so that new archival requests for the same
commit will not get fulfilled based on an archive that isn't yet
finished.
This asynchronous system is fairly primitive; request comes in, we'll
spawn off a new goroutine to handle it, then we'll mark it as done.
Status requests will see if the file exists in the final location,
and report the archival as done when it exists.
Fixes#11265
* Archive links: drop initial delay to three-quarters of a second
Some, or perhaps even most, archives will not take all that long to archive.
The archive process starts as soon as the download button is initially
clicked, so in theory they could be done quite quickly. Drop the initial
delay down to three-quarters of a second to make it more responsive in the
common case of the archive being quickly created.
* archiver: restructure a little bit to facilitate testing
This introduces two sync.Cond pointers to the archiver package. If they're
non-nil when we go to process a request, we'll wait until signalled (at all)
to proceed. The tests will then create the sync.Cond so that it can signal
at-will and sanity-check the state of the queue at different phases.
The author believes that nil-checking these two sync.Cond pointers on every
archive processing will introduce minimal overhead with no impact on
maintainability.
* gofmt nit: no space around binary + operator
* services: archiver: appease golangci-lint, lock queueMutex
Locking/unlocking the queueMutex is allowed, but not required, for
Cond.Signal() and Cond.Broadcast(). The magic at play here is just a little
too much for golangci-lint, as we take the address of queueMutex and this is
mostly used in archiver.go; the variable still gets flagged as unused.
* archiver: tests: fix several timing nits
Once we've signaled a cond var, it may take some small amount of time for
the goroutines released to hit the spot we're wanting them to be at. Give
them an appropriate amount of time.
* archiver: tests: no underscore in var name, ungh
* archiver: tests: Test* is run in a separate context than TestMain
We must setup the mutex/cond variables at the beginning of any test that's
going to use it, or else these will be nil when the test is actually ran.
* archiver: tests: hopefully final tweak
Things got shuffled around such that we carefully build up and release
requests from the queue, so we can validate the state of the queue at each
step. Fix some assertions that no longer hold true as fallout.
* repo: Download: restore some semblance of previous behavior
When archival was made async, the GET endpoint was only useful if a previous
POST had initiated the download. This commit restores the previous behavior,
to an extent; we'll now submit the archive request there and return a
"202 Accepted" to indicate that it's processing if we didn't manage to
complete the request within ~2 seconds of submission.
This lets a client directly GET the archive, and gives them some indication
that they may attempt to GET it again at a later time.
* archiver: tests: simplify a bit further
We don't need to risk failure and use time.ParseDuration to get 2 *
time.Second.
else if isn't really necessary if the conditions are simple enough and lead
to the same result.
* archiver: tests: resolve potential source of flakiness
Increase all timeouts to 10 seconds; these aren't hard-coded sleeps, so
there's no guarantee we'll actually take that long. If we need longer to
not have a false-positive, then so be it.
While here, various assert.{Not,}Equal arguments are flipped around so that
the wording in error output reflects reality, where the expected argument is
second and actual third.
* archiver: setup infrastructure for notifying consumers of completion
This API will *not* allow consumers to subscribe to specific requests being
completed, just *any* request being completed. The caller is responsible for
determining if their request is satisfied and waiting again if needed.
* repo: archive: make GET endpoint synchronous again
If the request isn't complete, this endpoint will now submit the request and
wait for completion using the new API. This may still be susceptible to
timeouts for larger repos, but other endpoints now exist that the web
interface will use to negotiate its way through larger archive processes.
* archiver: tests: amend test to include WaitForCompletion()
This is a trivial one, so go ahead and include it.
* archiver: tests: fix test by calling NewContext()
The mutex is otherwise uninitialized, so we need to ensure that we're
actually initializing it if we plan to test it.
* archiver: tests: integrate new WaitForCompletion a little better
We can use this to wait for archives to come in, rather than spinning and
hoping with a timeout.
* archiver: tests: combine numQueued declaration with next-instruction assignment
* routers: repo: reap unused archiving flag from DownloadStatus()
This had some planned usage before, indicating whether this request
initiated the archival process or not. After several rounds of refactoring,
this use was deemed not necessary for much of anything and got boiled down
to !complete in all cases.
* services: archiver: restructure to use a channel
We now offer two forms of waiting for a request:
- WaitForCompletion: wait for completion with no timeout
- TimedWaitForCompletion: wait for completion with timeout
In both cases, we wait for the given request's cchan to close; in the latter
case, we do so with the caller-provided timeout. This completely removes the
need for busy-wait loops in Download/InitiateDownload, as it's fairly clean
to wait on a channel with timeout.
* services: archiver: use defer to unlock now that we can
This previously carried the lock into the goroutine, but an intermediate
step just added the request to archiveInProgress outside of the new
goroutine and removed the need for the goroutine to start out with it.
* Revert "archiver: tests: combine numQueued declaration with next-instruction assignment"
This reverts commit bcc5214023.
Revert "archiver: tests: integrate new WaitForCompletion a little better"
This reverts commit 9fc8bedb56.
Revert "archiver: tests: fix test by calling NewContext()"
This reverts commit 709c35685e.
Revert "archiver: tests: amend test to include WaitForCompletion()"
This reverts commit 75261f56bc.
* archiver: tests: first attempt at WaitForCompletion() tests
* archiver: tests: slight improvement, less busy-loop
Just wait for the requests to complete in order, instead of busy-waiting
with a timeout. This is slightly less fragile.
While here, reverse the arguments of a nearby assert.Equal() so that
expected/actual are correct in any test output.
* archiver: address lint nits
* services: archiver: only close the channel once
* services: archiver: use a struct{} for the wait channel
This makes it obvious that the channel is only being used as a signal,
rather than anything useful being piped through it.
* archiver: tests: fix expectations
Move the close of the channel into doArchive() itself; notably, before these
goroutines move on to waiting on the Release cond.
The tests are adjusted to reflect that we can't WaitForCompletion() after
they've already completed, as WaitForCompletion() doesn't indicate that
they've been released from the queue yet.
* archiver: tests: set cchan to nil for comparison
* archiver: move ctx.Error's back into the route handlers
We shouldn't be setting this in a service, we should just be validating the
request that we were handed.
* services: archiver: use regex to match a hash
This makes sure we don't try and use refName as a hash when it's clearly not
one, e.g. heads/pull/foo.
* routers: repo: remove the weird /archive/status endpoint
We don't need to do this anymore, we can just continue POSTing to the
archive/* endpoint until we're told the download's complete. This avoids a
potential naming conflict, where a ref could start with "status/"
* archiver: tests: bump reasonable timeout to 15s
* archiver: tests: actually release timedReq
* archiver: tests: run through inFlight instead of manually checking
While we're here, add a test for manually re-processing an archive that's
already been complete. Re-open the channel and mark it incomplete, so that
doArchive can just mark it complete again.
* initArchiveLinks: prevent default behavior from clicking
* archiver: alias gitea's context, golang context import pending
* archiver: simplify logic, just reconstruct slices
While the previous logic was perhaps slightly more efficient, the
new variant's readability is much improved.
* archiver: don't block shutdown on waiting for archive
The technique established launches a goroutine to do the wait,
which will close a wait channel upon termination. For the timeout
case, we also send back a value indicating whether the timeout was
hit or not.
The timeouts are expected to be relatively small, but still a multi-
second delay to shutdown due to this could be unfortunate.
* archiver: simplify shutdown logic
We can just grab the shutdown channel from the graceful manager instead of
constructing a channel to halt the caller and/or pass a result back.
* Style issues
* Fix mis-merge
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
- introduce variable for border-radius value
- fix some white borders in arc-green
- add text selection and placeholder in arc-green
- tweak branch list footer
- more things I forgot
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* routers: make /compare route available to unauthenticated users
Remove some bits of the compare interface if the user isn't signed in.
Notably, they don't need to see the "New Pull Request" button box nor the
hidden form that would fail to submit due to the POST request continuing to
require proper privileges.
Follow-up commits will improve the UI a bit around this, removing some
"Pull Request" verbiage in favor of "Compare."
* ui: home: show "compare" button for unauthenticated users
This change requires pulling in the BaseRepo unconditionally and
recording if the pull request is in-fact not allowed
(.PullRequestCtx.Allowed). If the user isn't allowed to create a pull
request, either because this isn't a fork or same-fork branch PRs aren't
allowed, then we'll name the button "Compare" instead of "Pull Request."
* ui: branch list: use the new Compare language when available
When viewing the branch listing as an unauthenticated user, you'll get
"Pull Request" buttons. use the new "Compare" verbiage instead, which
matches GitHub behavior when you can't issue a pull request from the
branches.
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Once a branch has been merged if the commit ID no longer equals that of
the pulls ref commit id don't offer to delete the branch on the pull screen
and don't list it as merged on branches.
Fix#9201
When looking at the pull page we should also get the commits from the refs/pulls/x/head
Fix#9158
* add download-button info message
* add overflow-visible css for table colum class
* right colum is always there
* add download button for default branch
* add download button for all other branchs
* resize table colum so two buttons fit in
* code indent avter rebase
* show commit divergence corect
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/7625
* changes because of merge master into ...
* optimize if statement for protected branches
* dont downloat a deleted branch - fix error 404
The default branch's name on the branches page
for a repo was previously simply text and did
not link anywhere.
The name is now a link to the default branch
just like the non-default branch names.
Signed-off-by: Gary Kim <gary@garykim.dev>
* Add branch protection information to branches page
This change will add a tag on the ui that indicates
whether a branch is protected on the repository
branches page.
Signed-off-by: Gary Kim <gary@garykim.dev>
* Add last commit information to repo branches page
This change adds the ID and commit message of the last
commit on a branch to the branches page for repositories.
Signed-off-by: Gary Kim <gary@garykim.dev>
* Make branch page commit message truncate in css rather then template
The truncating of commit messages shown under branches
in the repository branches page has been moved to using
css rather then the Go template as the template was causing
some issues when the commit messaged had a link when rendered.
This commit also makes the commit message paragraph itself
use flex in order to make managing its elements easier.
Signed-off-by: Gary Kim <gary@garykim.dev>
* Show Pull Request button or status of latest PR in branch list
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Do not show pull request button on deleted branches
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Do not show commit divergence on deleted branches
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Use XORMs Get instead of limit
* Links pull request ID and use smaller labels for displaying the pull request status
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Handle error when getting latest pull request
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Indent template
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Check error when loading issue
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Call Git API to determine divergence of a branch and its base branch
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Show commit divergance in branch list
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Adds missing comment
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Adds test for diverging commits
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Try comparing commits instead of branches
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Removes test as CI can't run it
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Adjusts signature of percentage function to allow providing multiple integers as numerator
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* Moves CountDivergingCommits function into repofiles module
Signed-off-by: Mario Lubenka <mario.lubenka@googlemail.com>
* refactor struct's time to remove unnecessary memory usage
* use AsTimePtr simple code
* fix tests
* fix time compare
* fix template on gpg
* use AddDuration instead of Add
