This is a X-GitHub Header port
* repository for repository webhooks (matches GitHub)
* organization for organization webhooks (matches GitHub)
* user for user webhooks (Gitea specific)
* system for system webhooks (Gitea specific)
* default for default hooks needs testing (Gitea specific)
- `X-Gitea-Hook-Installation-Target-Type`
- `X-GitHub-Hook-Installation-Target-Type`
Replace all contexts in tests with go1.24 t.Context()
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Gitea Actions generated target url doesn't contain host and port. So we
need to include them for external webhook visiting.
Fix#33603
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Noticed a SQL in gitea.com has a bigger load. It seems both `is_pull`
and `pin_order` are not indexed columns in the database.
```SQL
SELECT `id`, `repo_id`, `index`, `poster_id`, `original_author`, `original_author_id`, `name`, `content`, `content_version`, `milestone_id`, `priority`, `is_closed`, `is_pull`, `num_comments`, `ref`, `pin_order`, `deadline_unix`, `created_unix`, `updated_unix`, `closed_unix`, `is_locked`, `time_estimate` FROM `issue` WHERE (repo_id =?) AND (is_pull = 0) AND (pin_order > 0) ORDER BY pin_order
```
I came across a comment
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24406#issuecomment-1527747296
from @delvh , which presents a more reasonable approach. Based on this,
this PR will migrate all issue and pull request pin data from the
`issue` table to the `issue_pin` table. This change benefits larger
Gitea instances by improving scalability and performance.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* download endpoint has to use 302 redirect
* fake blob download used if direct download not possible
* downloading v3 artifacts not possible
New repo apis based on GitHub Rest V3
- GET /runs/{run}/artifacts (Cannot use run index of url due to not
being unique)
- GET /artifacts
- GET + DELETE /artifacts/{artifact_id}
- GET /artifacts/{artifact_id}/zip
- (GET /artifacts/{artifact_id}/zip/raw this is a workaround for a http
302 assertion in actions/toolkit)
- api docs removed this is protected by a signed url like the internal
artifacts api and no longer usable with any token or swagger
- returns http 401 if the signature is invalid
- or change the artifact id
- or expired after 1 hour
Closes#33353Closes#32124
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Only show the latest version of the package in the arch repo.
closes#33534
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
In the old `pickTask`, when getting secrets or variables failed, the
task could get stuck in the `running` status (task status is `running`
but the runner did not fetch the task). To fix this issue, these steps
should be in one transaction.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Some old code use direct type-casting to get context, it causes
problems.
This PR fixes all legacy problems and use correct `ctx.Value` to get
low-level contexts.
Fix#33518
- Find the variable before updating or deleting
- Move the main logic from `routers/web/repo/setting/variables.go` to
`routers/web/shared/actions/variables.go`.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
* Implemented calling git diff-tree
* Ensures wrapper function is called with valid arguments
* Parses output into go struct, using strong typing when possible
1. Fix incorrect `MentionCount` (actually it seems to be deadcode,
affects nothing)
2. Remove fallback sha1 support for time limit token
3. Use route middleware `reqRepoActionsWriter` for `ArtifactsDeleteView`
4. Use clearer message "Failed to authenticate user" instead of "Verify"
when auth fails
5. `tests/integration/benchmarks_test.go` is not quite right, actually
it is never used, so delete it.
6. Remove or update TODO comments
Dear Gitea team,
first of all, thanks for the great work you're doing with this project.
I'm planning to introduce Gitea at a client site, and noticed that while
there is time recording, there are no project-manager-friendly reports
to actually make use of that data, as were also mentioned by others in
#4870#8684 and #13531.
Since I had a little time last weekend, I had put together something
that I hope to be a useful contribution to this great project (while of
course useful for me too).
This PR adds a new "Worktime" tab to the Organisation level. There is a
date range selector (by default set to the current month), and there are
three possible views:
- by repository,
- by milestone, and
- by team member.
Happy to receive any feedback!
There are several possible future improvements of course (predefined
date ranges, charts, a member time sheet, matrix of repos/members, etc)
but I hope that even in this relatively simple state this would be
useful to lots of people.
<img width="1161" alt="Screen Shot 2022-05-25 at 22 12 58"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/118010/170366976-af00c7af-c4f3-4117-86d7-00356d6797a5.png">
Keep up the good work!
Kristof
---------
Co-authored-by: user <user@kk-git1>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
