Backport #29470 by @silverwind
Ported the function as-is and added comments so we don't forget about
this in the future.
Fixes: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/29462
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Backport #29439 by @sillyguodong
Previously, it will be treated as "re-run all jobs" when `jobIndex ==
0`. So when you click re-run button on the first job, it triggers all
the jobs actually.
Caused by #26535.
Co-authored-by: sillyguodong <33891828+sillyguodong@users.noreply.github.com>
Backport #29377 by wxiaoguang
Regression of #18718. When submitting the form,
EditRepoFileForm.TreePath is marked as "Required", so the value can't be
empty. The value is not used by backend, so use a meaningful dummy value
for it.
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #27263 by @lunny
This PR will also keep the consistent between list assigned users and
check assigned users.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #29105
`ctx.Error` only displays the text but `ctx.ServerError` renders the
usual error page.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #29047
Add more details for the docker tag when using container registry.
Co-authored-by: wienans <40465543+wienans@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #29347 by @carlosfelgueiras
Fixes#27188.
Introduces a check on the installation that tries to parse the FROM
address. If it fails, shows a new error message to the user.
Co-authored-by: Carlos Felgueiras <carlosfelgueiras@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
The submitted tests in the patch for the XSS fix is not right.
To test, it should test "what should happen", but not "what doesn't
exist" or "what is processed/decoded".
Backport #29342 by @Zettat123
Fix#29249
~~Use the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/archive/{archive}` API to download.~~
Apply #26430 to archive download URLs.
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
When releasing, the releaser should read all the pull requests carefully
and do some adjustments because some of pull requests' labels are not
right when it's merged.
And the changelog tool needs to be adjusted. If one pull request has
both `bug` and `API`, it should mark it as `bug` but not `API`.
- The Wiki page did not sanitize author name
- the reviewer name on a "dismiss review" comment is also affected
- the migration page has some spots
---------
Signed-off-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <postmaster@gusted.xyz>
Co-authored-by: jolheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Backport #29295 by @lunny
Fix#28843
This PR will bypass the pushUpdateTag to database failure when
syncAllTags. An error log will be recorded.
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Fixes#28945
Backport #28948
Setting the avatar is wrong and creating a random password is equal to
leave it empty.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Backport #29277 by @Zettat123
Fix#29175
Replace #29207
This PR makes some improvements to the `issue_comment` workflow trigger
event.
1. Fix the bug that pull requests cannot trigger `issue_comment`
workflows
2. Previously the `issue_comment` event only supported the `created`
activity type. This PR adds support for the missing `edited` and
`deleted` activity types.
3. Some events (including `issue_comment`, `issues`, etc. ) only trigger
workflows that belong to the workflow file on the default branch. This
PR introduces the `IsDefaultBranchWorkflow` function to check for these
events.
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Backport #29297 by @KN4CK3R
Fixes#29101
Related #29298
Discard all read data to prevent misinterpreting existing data. Some
discard calls were missing in error cases.
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: yp05327 <576951401@qq.com>
Backport #29173Fix#29166
Add support for the following activity types of `pull_request`
- assigned
- unassigned
- review_requested
- review_request_removed
- milestoned
- demilestoned
Backport #29298
Fixes the reason why #29101 is hard to replicate.
Related #29297
Create a repo with a file with minimum size 4097 bytes (I use 10000) and
execute the following code:
```go
gitRepo, err := gitrepo.OpenRepository(db.DefaultContext, <repo>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
commit, err := gitRepo.GetCommit(<sha>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
entry, err := commit.GetTreeEntryByPath(<file>)
assert.NoError(t, err)
b := entry.Blob()
// Create a reader
r, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err)
defer r.Close()
// Create a second reader
r2, err := b.DataAsync()
assert.NoError(t, err) // Should be no error but is ErrNotExist
defer r2.Close()
```
The problem is the check in `CatFileBatch`:
79217ea63c/modules/git/repo_base_nogogit.go (L81-L87)
`Buffered() > 0` is used to check if there is a "operation" in progress
at the moment. This is a problem because we can't control the internal
buffer in the `bufio.Reader`. The code above demonstrates a sequence
which initiates an operation for which the code thinks there is no
active processing. The second call to `DataAsync()` therefore reuses the
existing instances instead of creating a new batch reader.
The bug has been fixed on v1.22 but not backport to v1.21.
This original PR have many refactors so I don't think it's necessary to
backport all of them.
Fix#28667
For some user (as me), documentation lack of precision about where to
store issue/pr template.
I propose an enhancement about this point. With bold exergue and
precision about server itself.
I've found some user with same interrogation as :
https://forum.gitea.com/t/issue-template-directory/3328
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Backport #29203
Relates to #28654, #29039 and #29050.
The "show outdated comments" flag should only apply to the file diff
view.
On the PR timeline, outdated comments are always shown. So they should
also be loaded when (un)resolving a conversation on the timeline page.
Backport #29155 with an extra change: tolerate the git 2.43.1 GIT_FLUSH
bug in Gitea 1.21.x, more details in the comment of repo_attribute.go
Manually tested with git 2.43.1 and an old git (2.39.2)
