This PR highlights the nature of the destructive action.
It also rewords the action buttons to remove ambiguity.
Signed-off-by: André Jaenisch <andre.jaenisch@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* Improve UX on modal for deleting an access token
Before, both action buttons where coloured on hover. Otherwise they
appeared as ghost buttons. UX tells us, that call to action must not
be displayed as ghost button.
Using red is perceived as warning colour in Western cultures. It was
used for the non-destructive action before. This PR swaps the colour
and turns the cancel button into a filled one, so it is saver to do
nothing then to accidentally delete an access button. We want the
person to do this consciously.
In another iteration the wording here could be improved. See the
associated issue for further details.
Signed-off-by: André Jaenisch <andre.jaenisch@posteo.de>
* Use tabs instead of spaces.
Linter does not complain anymore. I was expecting the formatter to pick
this up but it didn't.
Signed-off-by: André Jaenisch <andre.jaenisch@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
The recommended way is to use the name of the organisation followed
by "logo". however, since this is my first contribution, I am not
entirely sure, whether this is the best approach here.
The organisation is different from the organisation you can create as
part of the application. Instead, it is more related to the site
hosting the instance. Plus, I don't know how to best handle it when
the logo image is swapped out. Therefore, I use plain "Logo" and hope
that the person visiting the site has enough context.
Signed-off-by: André Jaenisch <andre.jaenisch@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
André JaenischandGitHub
