* Fix ui bug in wiki commit page
TODO: Maybe we should allow wiki to have its own ``.editorconfig`` file.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* fix a small nit
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
* docs: update 'Testing redux' in CONTRIBUTING.md
try simplfy it to make it more easy for contributor to follow it to
test their work by themselves.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* align help message strings
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
If user create pull review through api but not set CommitID,
I think it's necessary to use last headCommitID as default seting,
or this review will be considered as stale review which is wrong
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
That's because many notic have more than one lines. So I think
pre is more better to used in here than p
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* as title, do same changs on action view with #10737
* chage default icon from "invalid type" to "question" , because "invalid type" is not a meaningfull icon type
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Add a way to mark Conversation (code comment) resolved
mark Conversation is a way to mark a Conversation is stale
or be solved. when it's marked as stale, will be hided like
stale. all Pull Request writer , Offical Reviewers and poster
can add or remove Conversation resolved mark.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* fix lint
* Apply suggestions from code review
* Add ResolveDoer
* fix ui
Co-Authored-By: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-Authored-By: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* change IsResolved to an function
Add permission check in UpdateResolveConversation
* Apply suggestions from code review
* change return error for permisson check
* add default message for deleted user
* get issue message from comment
* add migration for ``ResolveDoerID`` column
another change:
* block mark pending review as resolved because it's not necessary
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* change button color
* resolve button size
* fix code style
* remove unusefull code
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix some bug about Request review
* fix ``CreateComment`` wrong using ,it will not work when use Sqlite
* fix wrong js click event code , it will send wrong data when it has
many choices
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-Authored-By: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* add getReviewerByIssueIDAndUserID
fix wrong conditions check in initIssueComments after #10972
* call CI again
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* add request review feature in pull request
add a way to notify specific reviewers to review like github , by add or delet a special type
review . The acton is is similar to Assign , so many code reuse the function and items of
Assignee, but the meaning and result is different.
The Permission style is is similar to github, that only writer can add a review request from Reviewers,
but the poster can recall and remove a review request after a reviwer has revied even if he don't have
Write Premission. only manager , the poster and reviewer of a request review can remove it.
The reviewers can be requested to review contain all readers for private repo , for public, contain
all writers and watchers.
The offical Review Request will block merge if Reject can block it.
an other change: add ui otify for Assignees.
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* new change
* add placeholder string
* do some changes follow #10238 to add review requests num on lists also
change icon for review requests to eye
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
* ui: limit managers prohibit themself to login
Because I think it's crazy and not reasonale , that if a user can
prohibit themself to login. so suggest limit this choice on ui
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* skip self Prohibit Login in post event handle
* fix comment
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
* ui: add more message on sidebar menus
* add title on the menus
* show some message instead of hide choose bar when have nothing to choose
* add simply filter for each menus
* do same changes in mew_form.tmpl
* remove some unusefull comments in mew_form.tmpl
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
* do review suggestions
* add filter message on sidebar filter
* change IsIssueWriter to HasIssuesOrPullsWritePermission
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
* change the icon of ApproveReview pr from "eye" to "check" like github
* change the icon of RejectReview pr from "x" to "request-change" like github
* add "-" after "{{" which need to be one line (TODO: may be not change all)
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: guillep2k <18600385+guillep2k@users.noreply.github.com>
Because the assigness has been loaded in
compare.go 416:
RetrieveRepoMetas(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository, true)
then
issue.go 381
RetrieveRepoMilestonesAndAssignees(ctx, repo)
then
issue.go 361 -- 365 , they are load assignees
So the code on compare.go 425 -- 427 is double work,
and which is the reason of #10853
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
reason:
If user can't choose the Assignees labels and Milestone It's
not usefull to show a gear label , and it It will mislead the
user into thinking that it's a BUG rather than thy don't have
permission to chosse them.
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
