Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
oliverpoolandGitHub 8030614386 fix: release page for empty or non-existing target (#24470)
Fixes #24145

To solve the bug, I added a "computed" `TargetBehind` field to the
`Release` model, which indicates the target branch of a release.
This is particularly useful if the target branch was deleted in the
meantime (or is empty).

I also did a micro-optimization in `calReleaseNumCommitsBehind`. Instead
of checking that a branch exists and then call `GetBranchCommit`, I
immediately call `GetBranchCommit` and handle the `git.ErrNotExist`
error.

This optimization is covered by the added unit test.
2023-05-10 11:43:55 +08:00
75ea0d5dba Faster git.GetDivergingCommits (#24482)
Using `git rev-list --left-right` is almost 2x faster than calling `git
rev-list` twice.

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
2023-05-04 05:08:41 +00:00
bb2783860b fix calReleaseNumCommitsBehind (#24148)
`repoCtx.CommitsCount` is not reliably the commit count of the default
branch (Repository.GetCommitsCount depends on what is currently
displayed).

For instance on the releases page the commit count is correct:
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/releases


![2023-04-15-215027](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/232250500-6c05dc00-7030-4ec9-87f1-18c7797d36bf.png)

However it is not on the single page:
https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/pages-server/releases/tag/v4.6.2


![2023-04-15-215036](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/232250503-620c8038-7c2c-45a1-b99d-cb994ef955a6.png)

This PR fixes this by removing a "fast branch" which was using this
field (I think this field should be removed, since it is a bit
unpredictable - but this would mean a larger refactoring PR).

_contributed in the context of @forgejo_

---------

Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-04-18 21:11:17 +02:00
3596df52c0 Fix hidden commit status on multiple checks (#22889)
Since #22632, when a commit status has multiple checks, no check is
shown at all (hence no way to see the other checks).

This PR fixes this by always adding a tag with the
`.commit-statuses-trigger` to the DOM (the `.vm` is for vertical
alignment).

![2023-02-13-120528](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/218441846-1a79c169-2efd-46bb-9e75-d8b45d7cc8e3.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-20 16:43:04 +08:00
b6e81357bd Add Webhook authorization header (#20926)
_This is a different approach to #20267, I took the liberty of adapting
some parts, see below_

## Context

In some cases, a weebhook endpoint requires some kind of authentication.
The usual way is by sending a static `Authorization` header, with a
given token. For instance:

- Matrix expects a `Bearer <token>` (already implemented, by storing the
header cleartext in the metadata - which is buggy on retry #19872)
- TeamCity #18667
- Gitea instances #20267
- SourceHut https://man.sr.ht/graphql.md#authentication-strategies (this
is my actual personal need :)

## Proposed solution

Add a dedicated encrypt column to the webhook table (instead of storing
it as meta as proposed in #20267), so that it gets available for all
present and future hook types (especially the custom ones #19307).

This would also solve the buggy matrix retry #19872.

As a first step, I would recommend focusing on the backend logic and
improve the frontend at a later stage. For now the UI is a simple
`Authorization` field (which could be later customized with `Bearer` and
`Basic` switches):


![2022-08-23-142911](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3864879/186162483-5b721504-eef5-4932-812e-eb96a68494cc.png)

The header name is hard-coded, since I couldn't fine any usecase
justifying otherwise.

## Questions

- What do you think of this approach? @justusbunsi @Gusted @silverwind 
- ~~How are the migrations generated? Do I have to manually create a new
file, or is there a command for that?~~
- ~~I started adding it to the API: should I complete it or should I
drop it? (I don't know how much the API is actually used)~~

## Done as well:

- add a migration for the existing matrix webhooks and remove the
`Authorization` logic there


_Closes #19872_

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Gusted <williamzijl7@hotmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2022-11-03 20:23:20 +02:00
oliverpoolandGitHub 0a9ed54abb refactor webhook *EditPost (#20780) 2022-08-23 02:52:35 -04:00
oliverpoolandGitHub c81b26b0e5 refactor webhook *NewPost (#20729)
* refactor webhook *NewPost

* remove empty values

* always show errs.Message

* remove utils.IsValidSlackChannel

* move IsValidSlackChannel to services/webhook package

* binding: handle empty Message case

* make IsValidSlackChannel more strict
2022-08-11 17:48:23 +02:00